HF Foods Group is a leading distributor of Asian foodservice products across the United States and, following its Searay acquisition, Canada. Its third-quarter report carried particular weight because it combined two competing narratives: a resilient top line and a deteriorating bottom line. Investors were watching closely to see whether the company could convert its recent acquisition-led growth into profit while managing rising fuel expenses. The quarter also served as the first glimpse of Searay's contribution after the deal closed on August 31, 2026. With management reiterating a long-term adjusted EBITDA margin target of 4.5% to 5% or more, this report offered a key test of whether near-term cost pressures are truly transitory or signal a more persistent squeeze on margins.
HF Foods Group reported third-quarter 2026 net revenue of $319.6 million, up 4.1% from $307.0 million in the prior-year period. Gross profit increased 5.9% to $53.4 million, and gross margin expanded to 16.7% from 16.4%. However, distribution, selling, and administrative (DS&A) expenses jumped 11.9% to $55.2 million, rising to 17.3% of revenue from 16.1% a year earlier.
On the bottom line, the company posted a GAAP net loss of $4.2 million, or $0.08 per share, compared with a net loss of $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA declined 6.3% to $11.0 million from $11.7 million, and adjusted net income per share fell to $0.04 from $0.08. The results reflected a revenue beat but missed consensus earnings expectations, as profitability was weighed down by fuel inflation and roughly $3.7 million in non-routine professional fees linked to the revolver amendment, property refinancing, the Searay deal, and legal matters. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Post-earnings sentiment centered on the gap between revenue growth and profit shortfalls. The top-line beat was tempered by the recognition that Searay contributed $4.2 million in its first month, leaving organic growth closer to 2.7%. Management acknowledged that profitability fell short of its own expectations, and the earlier outlook for low-single-digit adjusted EBITDA growth in 2026 now appears difficult to reach, with nine-month adjusted EBITDA down 1.8% year over year. Investors also noted that fuel surcharges, now implemented across the customer base, only partially recover diesel cost increases, suggesting margin pressure could extend into 2027. The Charlotte distribution center permitting timeline was pushed out again, and cross-selling was reframed as a three-to-five-year build, further tempering near-term optimism.
Looking ahead, the fourth quarter of 2026 will represent the first full quarter of Searay ownership, giving investors a cleaner read on the acquisition's higher-margin contribution. Searay earned a mid-teens adjusted EBITDA margin in its first month, well above the company's consolidated margin, so its integration trajectory will be a key swing factor.
Fuel costs remain the most visible near-term risk. Diesel prices ran well above prior-year levels through the third quarter, and the company's fuel surcharge program is designed to recover only part of that expense. How surcharges interact with competitive pricing through the remainder of the year will shape margin outcomes.
Beyond those items, investors should watch the Charlotte facility permitting process, expected to resolve around year-end, and the pace of the broader transformation program as it shifts from implementation to optimization. A planned Los Angeles direct-import operation and a described "vibrant" Canadian M&A pipeline represent additional catalysts. Management reiterated its 4.5% to 5%-plus adjusted EBITDA margin target but declined to frame 2027 guidance given fuel price uncertainty, leaving cost discipline and integration execution as the central factors to monitor.
In my analysis of names like HF Foods Group, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter stocks by technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics. It helps surface ideas that align with specific criteria without manual effort, which I find useful when monitoring acquisition impacts or margin trends across the sector.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
HFFG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 36 of 43 cases where HFFG's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where HFFG's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 27 of 39 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 48 of 62 cases where HFFG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HFFG just turned positive on November 04, 2026. Looking at past instances where HFFG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +3.47% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HFFG advanced for three days, in 154 of 222 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on HFFG as a result. In 68 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HFFG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator for HFFG entered a downward trend on November 09, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 25 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.395) is normal, around the industry mean (3.045). P/E Ratio (-2.262) is within average values for comparable stocks, (55.291). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.355) is also within normal values, averaging (0.741). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.015) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.070) is also within normal values, averaging (0.357).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 72 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. HFFG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HFFG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of food service distribution services
Industry FoodDistributors