HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) is a cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) platform company serving businesses across marketing, sales, and service. As a stock, it carries broad but increasingly divided sell-side coverage. Reviewing current, attributed analyst price targets, the field spans roughly $170 on the low end to about $320 on the high end, with an arithmetic mean near $245–$248 and a median near $240. Rounding the mean produces the $250 central target used throughout this article.
The dispersion is meaningful. Cautious voices have been cutting hard: following the company's November 4 third-quarter report, Piper Sandler moved to Neutral and lowered its target from $220 to $200, Cantor Fitzgerald downgraded to Underweight and cut from $265 to $170, Wells Fargo set a $200 target, and UBS trimmed to $170. Meanwhile, constructive firms such as Canaccord Genuity and Needham have reiterated Buy ratings with $300 targets. The wide gap reflects a core debate — whether AI is a durable growth engine for HubSpot or a competitive threat to its traditional SMB marketing base. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
The latest verified price sits near $203, down roughly 47% over the trailing 52 weeks from a high above $400. Reaching $250 would require about 23% upside, a substantial move that implies meaningful re-rating and execution improvement rather than a routine bounce.
The path depends on growth stabilization. HubSpot's Q3 2026 adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $3.81 beat the $3.27 consensus, and revenue of $947.6 million rose about 17% year over year and topped estimates. But management guided Q4 revenue to $945–$947 million and adjusted EPS to $3.85–$3.87, below Street expectations, and flagged that net revenue retention would decline roughly two points for the year. Shares fell on the guidance shortfall. Closing the gap to $250 likely requires evidence that the seats-and-credits pricing model and AI features are reaccelerating net upgrades, not just cutting costs.
The stock's 52-week range runs from about $170 to over $400, underscoring how much value has been given back. The $170 level is the key support zone, reinforced by the 52-week low and the most bearish analyst targets. The $200 round number is a near-term psychological pivot. On the upside, $230–$240 marks the first resistance cluster near the median target and recent downgrade levels, while $300 represents a larger recovery milestone that only the most bullish targets contemplate. From what I see, monitoring these levels closely helps clarify the risk-reward profile.
Most analyst price targets reflect a roughly 12-month research horizon, though individual firms differ in methodology and timing. The most important upcoming items are HubSpot's fourth-quarter earnings and 2027 guidance, where management has said it will revisit growth expectations. Investors should also watch net revenue retention, the rollout of the seats-and-credits model across EMEA (Europe, the Middle East, and Africa), analyst estimate revisions, and broader software-sector valuation trends. No single data point will settle the $250 question; the trajectory of growth reacceleration matters most. I’m watching this closely as the next earnings release approaches.
Tickeron's AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals have become a regular part of my routine when following names like this one. The tool uses artificial intelligence to continuously monitor thousands of stocks and ETFs (exchange-traded funds), generating Buy, Sell, or Hold signals based on shifting market conditions, technical behavior, and AI-driven analysis. It helps me spot changing trends more efficiently than manual screening alone, providing a useful supplement to fundamental research and analyst coverage when tracking a volatile name like HubSpot.
The $250 central target is the rounded mean of current analyst price targets, sitting roughly 23% above the latest price. It is achievable only if HubSpot demonstrates that AI products and its new pricing model reaccelerate growth and stabilize net revenue retention. Bullish analysts point to improving margins, multi-hub adoption, and a compressed valuation, while bears emphasize weak guidance, competitive AI threats, and falling retention. The wide $170–$320 target range shows how little consensus exists. Rather than predicting an outcome, investors should monitor the Q4 report, 2027 guidance, and retention metrics to judge whether the stock can build a durable path toward $250.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
On November 13, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for HUBS moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 60 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 47 of the 60 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 78%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where HUBS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The 50-day moving average for HUBS moved above the 200-day moving average on October 27, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +7.08% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HUBS advanced for three days, in 232 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
HUBS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 159 of 218 cases where HUBS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 73%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on HUBS as a result. In 67 of 94 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for HUBS turned negative on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 57%.
HUBS moved below its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for HUBS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HUBS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. HUBS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 89 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.038) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.906). P/E Ratio (70.887) is within average values for comparable stocks, (9.554). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.247) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.069) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.618) is also within normal values, averaging (70.383).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HUBS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a developer of Internet marketing software solutions
Industry PackagedSoftware