Both ICF and MORT provide ways to access U.S. real estate through ETFs, yet they operate in distinct parts of the sector. ICF focuses on equity REITs that own physical properties, while MORT targets mortgage REITs that finance real estate through mortgages and related securities. They do not directly compete but instead offer alternative routes for real estate exposure. I find the comparison relevant now, given ongoing shifts in interest rate expectations, financing costs, and how investors allocate between property ownership and mortgage credit.
ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, which includes larger, more liquid U.S. equity REITs. The fund is passively managed and non-diversified, typically holding around 30 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.32%. Its top positions often include WELL, PLD, EQIX, AMT, SPG, and PSA, which together represent a significant portion of assets. Exposure leans toward data centers, telecom towers, healthcare, retail, industrial, and self-storage, with minimal office or hotel allocation. Income is distributed quarterly, and the fund shows equity-like volatility with a beta near or slightly above the broader market. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings align with industry peers.
MORT follows the MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark of U.S. mortgage REITs. It is passively managed and non-diversified, holding roughly 27 securities with a net expense ratio of 0.43%. Rather than owning physical assets, its components use leverage to invest in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, loan originations, and mortgage servicing rights. The portfolio concentrates on names such as NLY, AGNC, STWD, RITM, and DX. Nearly all assets fall into the financials sector, and the 30-day SEC yield has often reached double digits, underscoring the income potential alongside the leveraged profile.
Both funds respond to capital costs and availability, though through different channels. Equity REITs in ICF draw on steady property income, demand for data centers and towers tied to artificial intelligence and digital trends, and measured supply growth in areas like healthcare and self-storage. Mortgage REITs in MORT tie more directly to the yield curve, funding spreads, and prepayment risks. Regulatory factors around mortgage servicing also weigh more on mREITs. In recent cycles, higher financing costs have pressured mortgage REIT margins, while stronger property segments have delivered more resilient cash flows. From what I see, this backdrop favors more stable equity exposures at present.
Over recent periods, the funds have moved in line with their underlying focuses. ICF has generally followed the equity REIT group, supported by strength in data center, tower, and healthcare holdings amid secular themes and steadier financing. MORT has shown greater volatility and relative weakness, reflecting sensitivity to rate expectations and a funding environment that squeezes leveraged spreads. In positioning terms, ICF suggests moderate volatility with cyclical potential, while MORT acts more like a high-yield financial instrument carrying elevated drawdown and dividend-cut risks during stress.
One tool I turn to regularly for this kind of sector comparison is Tickeron’s AI Screener. It helps filter ETFs and stocks by technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, and performance metrics, allowing me to quickly surface ideas across real estate and financials without manual effort. This has sharpened my view on how funds like these stack up in the current environment.
Considering the structural details, Tickeron’s AI points toward ICF over MORT right now. ICF combines a lower expense ratio, broader property-type diversification, and exposure to growth areas like data centers and healthcare that support steadier cash-flow trends. MORT offers a higher headline yield but brings greater interest-rate sensitivity, volatility, and drawdown potential through its leveraged financials focus. Income-oriented investors with higher risk tolerance may still find MORT appealing, yet the probabilistic edge favors ICF for cost efficiency and resilience.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ICF turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where ICF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ICF as a result. In 75 of 92 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
ICF moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ICF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Following a +3.29% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ICF advanced for three days, in 266 of 318 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for ICF moved below the 200-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ICF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
ICF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for ICF entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category RealEstate