The Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) passively follows the MAC Global Solar Energy Index by investing at least 90% of assets in its components. Companies are chosen based on the role solar plays in their operations. The fund carries a 0.70% expense ratio and holds a market value near $878 million across about 36 positions.
It covers the full solar chain, from manufacturers of modules and inverters to project developers, trackers, and financiers. Leading holdings include Nextpower Inc. (NXT), First Solar (FSLR), Enlight Renewable Energy, and Enphase Energy (ENPH), along with HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital (HASI), Doral Group, GCL Technology, Clearway Energy (CWEN), SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG), and Sunrun (RUN). Sector weights show information technology, utilities, and industrials dominating, mirroring the mix of manufacturing, generation, and equipment supply.
Solar sits at the crossroads of several macro forces. Higher interest rates increase financing costs for both rooftop and large-scale projects, while ongoing module oversupply from Chinese producers has pushed prices lower and squeezed margins. At the same time, growing electricity needs from data centers and broader electrification continue to underpin utility-scale solar builds, offering a constructive long-term setting even if near-term conditions stay difficult.
Policy adds another layer. Tariffs, import limits on components, and clean-energy incentives shape equipment costs, project economics, and the edge held by domestic versus overseas suppliers. These elements, alongside investor appetite for growth and rate-sensitive stocks, help account for the volatility seen in solar names over recent cycles. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
TAN has faced steady selling pressure. It moved from roughly $43.97 down to about $40.20, marking an 8.6% decline over the trailing month, and dropped about 19% from near $49.84 over the past three months. The slide has been measured rather than abrupt, aligning with ongoing sector challenges instead of one-off events.
Results track closely with major holdings. First Solar and Enphase Energy, both sizable positions, react sharply to module prices, rates, and demand. Their weakness pulls the fund down more than its size alone would imply. The information-technology weighting heightens sensitivity to risk sentiment, as many suppliers behave like growth equities despite operating in industrials or utilities. From what I see, this setup explains why TAN can diverge from broader markets.
Interest-rate policy will likely stay pivotal: easier borrowing terms could ease project funding and lift valuations, while tight policy might keep weighing on residential and distributed solar. Inflation trends and central-bank moves will matter as much as company fundamentals.
Supply-side developments, including module capacity adjustments and any tariff or trade shifts, will affect pricing power for producers such as First Solar and GCL Technology. Utility-scale demand, supported by data-center power needs and grid upgrades, offers a steady positive for developers and equipment providers. Monitoring earnings from key holdings, flows into thematic ETFs, and changes in tax credits or import rules will remain important. These longer-term drivers, rather than daily price moves, should shape the fund’s path. I’m watching this closely with the help of Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to gauge potential shifts.
In my view, tools like Tickeron’s AI Screener offer a practical way to scan for opportunities across sectors and themes. It lets users apply technical indicators, fundamentals, volatility filters, AI signals, and custom criteria to identify trends or compare funds more efficiently than manual methods. For anyone looking at solar or renewable ETFs, it provides a structured approach to organizing ideas and tracking conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
TAN saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 76 of the 83 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TAN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for TAN entered a downward trend on October 28, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TAN just turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where TAN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 54 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Following a +3.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TAN advanced for three days, in 216 of 251 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
TAN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category MiscellaneousSector