Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 15, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) vs Banco Bradesco (BBD): Quality and Valuation in Brazil's Banking Sector

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) vs Banco Bradesco (BBD): Quality and Valuation in Brazil's Banking Sector

Key Takeaways

  • Itaú Unibanco delivers markedly higher profitability, with return on equity (ROE, a measure of profit generated per dollar of shareholder capital) above 24%, versus Banco Bradesco's roughly 16%.
  • BBD trades at a steep valuation discount near 0.7x book value and offers a higher dividend yield, but carries greater credit-quality risk.
  • ITUB shows stronger, more consistent asset quality and earnings momentum, while BBD has absorbed a wave of analyst downgrades in recent weeks.
  • Tickeron AI Verdict: Tickeron's AI currently favors ITUB (Itaú Unibanco) over BBD (Banco Bradesco).
  • Follow the latest developments through BBD Major News and BBD Today's Price Move, as well as ITUB Major News and ITUB Today's Price Move.
  • Explore top-performing automated strategies on Trending AI Robots.

Introduction

Banco Bradesco (BBD) and Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) rank among Brazil's largest private-sector banks, with both widely held via American Depositary Receipts. They operate in the same market and respond to identical interest-rate and credit cycles, so investors often compare them directly. This analysis matters particularly for those following Brazil's banking recovery, income investors attracted to dividend yields, and traders evaluating relative performance between a value-oriented turnaround candidate and a consistently profitable leader. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stocks compare to others in the industry.

BBD Overview and Recent Performance

Banco Bradesco stands as Brazil's second-largest private bank, controlling roughly 10–15% of deposits, and it serves as the country's largest insurance provider. The bank continues a multi-year recovery, posting a ninth straight quarter of recurring profit growth in early 2026, backed by rising net interest income and tight expense management. Its BBD ADR has faced pressure lately, sitting well below the 52-week high after a surprise Brazilian presidential election outcome sparked broad selling in domestic financial assets. Several major firms, including JPMorgan, Citi, Santander, and Itaú BBA, have downgraded the stock recently due to a tougher 2027 earnings outlook. The main worry centers on asset quality, with the 90-day non-performing loan ratio climbing, especially in small-business and consumer areas. On the upside, BBD trades near 0.7x book value and carries an elevated dividend yield that draws value buyers.

ITUB Overview and Recent Performance

Itaú Unibanco operates as Brazil's largest private-sector bank following the 2008 merger of Banco Itaú and Unibanco, with additional reach across Latin America. It has sustained steady growth and profitability, delivering recurring net income in the low-double-digit billions of Brazilian reais each quarter alongside an ROE near 24%. Its ITUB ADR has held up better in recent trading, staying well above the 52-week low even as Brazilian bank shares softened overall. Credit quality stands out as a key strength, with individual delinquency near historically low levels. Itaú has also moved selectively into new areas, including steps toward a U.S. national bank charter and the acquisition of NeoSpace. Its Common Equity Tier 1 ratio stays solidly above regulatory minimums, supporting returns to shareholders and balance-sheet strength.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The main difference between these banks comes down to quality versus valuation. Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) carries a premium multiple near 1.9x book value, supported by an ROE above 24%, low and stable non-performing loan ratios, and steady earnings growth. Banco Bradesco (BBD) trades near 0.7x book value—a discount of about 60% to Itaú that sits near a ten-year low—reflecting concerns over rising credit costs and a slower recovery. On dividends, BBD provides the higher yield, while ITUB offers a lower payout ratio yet more reliable capital returns. Both banks face heavy exposure to Brazil's Selic rate, fiscal policy, and consumer credit trends, leaving neither immune to macro swings. The choice remains straightforward: ITUB delivers stability and execution at a premium price, whereas BBD offers a lower entry point and richer yield in exchange for higher execution and asset-quality risks.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Looking at factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, credit-quality trends, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI currently points to ITUB over BBD. Itaú Unibanco's stronger and more durable profitability, lower and steadier delinquency metrics, and more consistent relative performance outweigh the valuation discount and higher dividend yield offered by Banco Bradesco. While BBD may suit contrarian, value-focused investors comfortable with turnaround risk, the AI's assessment highlights ITUB as the more reliable, lower-uncertainty option in the present setting. From what I see, this aligns with the broader data on asset quality and earnings momentum.

Exploring Automated Strategies with Tickeron

In my own research, I have turned to Tickeron's Trending AI Robots when looking at pairs like these. The section curates top-performing automated systems across different styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, refreshed to match current market conditions. It offers a practical way to identify data-driven approaches that align with prevailing trends in sectors such as Brazilian banking.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: BBD, ITUB

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


BBD in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on October 26, 2026

BBD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 27 of 35 cases where BBD's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BBD's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 35 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 65 cases where BBD's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BBD as a result. In 57 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.

Following a +4.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BBD advanced for three days, in 194 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BBD turned negative on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 26 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 62%.

BBD moved below its 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for BBD crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

The 50-day moving average for BBD moved below the 200-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BBD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

The Aroon Indicator for BBD entered a downward trend on November 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 21 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BBD's P/B Ratio (0.148) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.262). P/E Ratio (1.160) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.623) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.005) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. BBD's P/S Ratio (1.539) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.740).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BBD’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BBD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are US Bancorp (NYSE:USB), PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC), Itau Unibanco Banco Holding SA (NYSE:ITUB), Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (NYSE:DB), Huntington Bancshares (NASDAQ:HBAN), Banco Bradesco SA (NYSE:BBD), Regions Financial Corp (NYSE:RF), KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY).

Industry description

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Regional Banks Industry is 6.03B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 147.87 to 173.74B. DBSDF holds the highest valuation in this group at 173.74B. The lowest valued company is VLYPP at 147.87.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Regional Banks Industry was 1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 12%. AGBK experienced the highest price growth at 29%, while HWC experienced the biggest fall at -9%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Regional Banks Industry was 36%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 60% and the average quarterly volume growth was 41%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 51
P/E Growth Rating: 52
Price Growth Rating: 48
SMR Rating: 37
Profit Risk Rating: 56
Seasonality Score: 34 (-100 ... +100)
Trend Prediction Engine 4
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a major bank

Industry RegionalBanks

Industry
Major Banks
Address
Cidade de Deus S/N
Phone
+55 1121940922
Employees
82095
Web
https://www.bradescori.com.br
Interact to see
Advertisement
Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, holding roughly 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. The portfolio is heavily concentrated in information technology (about 68% of assets), with NVIDIA , Apple , Microsoft , Micron Technology , and Amazon among the largest holdings.
CRWV ( CoreWeave ) offers the largest scale and backlog but carries the heaviest debt burden and widest losses of the three. IREN ( IREN Limited ) is mid-transition, pivoting almost entirely from Bitcoin mining to AI cloud services, creating both a re-rating opportunity and execution risk.
The central price target used here is $400 , roughly 35% above Alphabet's latest verified closing price of $295.77 (November 13, 2026). This target is the arithmetic mean of verified analyst price targets reviewed, not a single analyst's forecast; independent data providers report comparable consensus averages in the high-$390s to low-$400s.
SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index, delivering broad exposure to roughly 500 of the largest publicly traded U.S. companies. The fund has eased roughly 2% over the trailing 30 days and about 3% over the past quarter, reflecting a modest, range-bound decline rather than a decisive trend.
QQQ is trading down -1.19% during regular market hours, falling from a prior close of $688.17 to $680.01. The primary catalyst is renewed pressure on the AI trade after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang resigned amid an alleged espionage scandal, with CFO Colette Kress named interim CEO and semiconductor names selling off sharply.