IUSV vs VTV: Weighing the Structural Differences in These Large-Cap Value ETFs

Key Takeaways

• Both IUSV and VTV are passively managed U.S. large-cap value ETFs, but IUSV tracks the S&P 900 Value Index (roughly 700 holdings) while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index (roughly 330 holdings).
• IUSV carries a substantially larger information technology allocation (around 24%) versus VTV (around 13–14%), giving IUSV more growth-oriented optionality within a value framework.
• VTV offers a marginally lower expense ratio (0.03%) than IUSV (0.04%) and tilts more heavily toward financials and health care.
• IUSV's larger, mid-cap-inclusive portfolio provides broader diversification, whereas VTV is more concentrated in mega-cap value names.
• Tickeron AI Verdict: IUSV is the preferred ticker of the two based on its broader diversification and blended value-quality-growth profile.

The Return of Value Strategies

Value investing has returned to the center of investor attention as markets rotate away from narrow mega-cap growth leadership toward cheaper, cash-generating businesses. In this context, the iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) compete directly as low-cost, index-based vehicles for broad U.S. large-cap value exposure. While both funds target the same investor goal—inexpensive access to undervalued American equities—they differ meaningfully in index methodology, number of holdings, and sector mix. This ETF comparison examines those structural differences, their sector exposure, and their relative positioning in the current market environment.

Inside the iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV)

The iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the S&P 900 Value Index, a benchmark spanning the large- and mid-cap value segment of the U.S. equity market. The index selects constituents from the S&P 900 universe—combining the S&P 500 and S&P MidCap 400—based on three value factors: book value-to-price, earnings-to-price, and sales-to-price ratios.

IUSV holds roughly 700 stocks, offering broad diversification that extends into the mid-cap range. Its largest positions include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon.com, Exxon Mobil, Berkshire Hathaway, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase, Procter & Gamble, Bank of America, and UnitedHealth Group. Because the S&P 900 Value methodology retains several large technology names, information technology is the fund's largest sector allocation at roughly 22–24%, followed by financials (around 15–16%), health care, industrials, and consumer discretionary. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.04% and distributes income quarterly, making it a cost-efficient core holding for value-oriented investors. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings stack up against peers.

Inside the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV)

The Vanguard Value ETF is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, which selects the less expensive half of the U.S. large-cap market using value characteristics such as low valuations, lower projected growth, and higher dividend yields. Unlike IUSV, VTV is confined to large-capitalization stocks and uses a market-cap-weighting approach.

VTV holds roughly 330 stocks, a more concentrated portfolio than IUSV. Its top holdings include Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, Micron Technology, AbbVie, Procter & Gamble, Home Depot, and Chevron. Sector exposure is led by financials at roughly 22–24%, followed by health care, industrials, and information technology (around 13–14%). VTV charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, among the lowest in its category, and provides quarterly distributions. Its focus on large, stable, dividend-paying businesses gives it a slightly more defensive, pure-value character.

Current Market Backdrop for Value

Both funds operate within the broader U.S. large-cap value universe, a segment that has benefited in recent market cycles from rotation out of expensive mega-cap growth stocks. Several catalysts are shaping this environment: elevated interest-rate expectations have favored financials, whose net interest margins can improve when rates stay higher for longer; energy and materials have been supported by firm commodity prices; and health care has attracted defensive capital amid macroeconomic uncertainty.

At the same time, both ETFs face sector risks. Heavy financials exposure ties performance to credit conditions and the interest-rate cycle, while energy allocations link returns to commodity volatility. The divergence in technology weight is also notable: IUSV's larger tech allocation means it retains some exposure to secular growth themes, whereas VTV's lighter tech weight offers more insulation from growth-stock valuation swings but less participation in tech-led rallies.

Recent Performance Dynamics

In recent weeks and months, the relative performance of these two funds has been shaped largely by sector rotation rather than by cost differences. When financials, energy, and industrials have led, VTV's heavier weighting in those areas has tended to support its returns. Conversely, during periods when technology and consumer discretionary names have re-accelerated, IUSV's larger allocations to those sectors have provided a relative tailwind.

From a risk and volatility standpoint, VTV's large-cap, dividend-rich composition has historically exhibited slightly lower beta than IUSV, which includes more mid-cap and technology exposure. IUSV's broader ~700-holding portfolio reduces single-stock concentration risk, while VTV's ~330-holding portfolio is somewhat more exposed to the earnings cycles of its largest mega-cap financial and health care holdings. Both funds remain highly liquid and low-cost, and their relative positioning hinges primarily on whether the market favors a purer value tilt (VTV) or a blended value-with-growth profile (IUSV).

Using Tickeron AI Tools in My Process

I frequently incorporate Tickeron’s AI tools into my ETF research to cross-check sector weights and diversification metrics. The AI Screener lets me apply custom filters for holdings count, expense ratios, and performance patterns, helping surface insights that complement traditional analysis. It is a practical addition to the workflow when evaluating funds like these.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Notable companies

Industry description

Market Cap

High and low price notable news

Volume