Go to the list of all blogs
M. Benett's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 11, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
IWV vs VOO: Weighing the Russell 3000 ETF Against the S&P 500 ETF

IWV vs VOO: Weighing the Russell 3000 ETF Against the S&P 500 ETF

Key Takeaways

  • IWV tracks the Russell 3000 Index across roughly 2,600 stocks spanning large-, mid-, and small-cap companies, while VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index of approximately 500 large-cap U.S. companies.
  • VOO carries a materially lower expense ratio (0.03%) versus IWV (0.20%), a structural cost advantage that compounds over time.
  • VOO is more concentrated at the top and more technology-heavy, while IWV offers broader diversification that includes mid- and small-cap exposure.
  • Both funds are passively managed, capitalization-weighted vehicles with nearly identical large-cap leadership, making them highly correlated over full market cycles.
  • Tickeron AI Verdict: VOO is favored for its lower cost, deeper liquidity, and consistent large-cap trend leadership.

Why These Two ETFs Often Come Up in Portfolio Discussions

Investors seeking broad U.S. equity exposure often weigh two structurally similar but meaningfully different exchange-traded funds (ETFs): the iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Both are passive, market-capitalization-weighted funds that capture the core of the American stock market, and their top holdings overlap substantially. Yet they do not compete identically: IWV pursues near-total market coverage, while VOO concentrates on the largest, most liquid names. This comparison examines structural differences, sector exposure, cost efficiency, and relative positioning to help determine which vehicle better aligns with individual goals.

Understanding the iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV)

The iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Russell 3000 Index, a float-adjusted, capitalization-weighted benchmark representing roughly 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. The fund holds approximately 2,600 securities spanning the full market-capitalization spectrum, including large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks. It uses a representative sampling indexing strategy to manage the portfolio efficiently.

IWV carries an expense ratio of 0.20%. Its top holdings include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL, with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly one-third of assets. Sector allocation is led by information technology (about 35%), followed by financials, health care, industrials, consumer discretionary, and communication services. This breadth makes IWV a comprehensive total-market benchmark with modest small-cap participation. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

Understanding the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a passively managed fund that tracks the S&P 500 Index, a benchmark of roughly 500 large-cap U.S. companies selected by an S&P index committee. The fund is capitalization-weighted and generally holds between 500 and 520 securities, focusing exclusively on larger, established businesses.

VOO charges an expense ratio of just 0.03%, among the lowest available for broad equity exposure. Its top holdings mirror those of IWV but at higher weights, led by NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL, with the top 10 positions representing nearly 39% of assets. Information technology is the dominant sector at roughly 40%, followed by financials, communication services, health care, and consumer discretionary. VOO is one of the most heavily traded and liquid ETFs in the market, with assets under management (AUM) exceeding $1 trillion.

Industry and Thematic Context

Both funds are heavily influenced by the same macro forces shaping the U.S. large-cap landscape. Artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure spending, cloud computing demand, and semiconductor innovation have concentrated market leadership in a narrow set of mega-cap technology names, which now drive a sizable share of index returns. Interest rate expectations and Federal Reserve policy continue to influence equity valuations, particularly for long-duration growth stocks, while earnings cycles among top holdings and sector rotation between technology and more value-oriented segments of the market shape relative performance.

For IWV, the presence of mid- and small-cap companies adds sensitivity to domestic economic conditions, credit availability, and market breadth. For VOO, the larger technology weighting makes it more responsive to AI-driven momentum and mega-cap earnings. Both remain exposed to concentration risk if leadership narrows further or if valuation multiples in the technology sector compress. From what I see, reviewing these dynamics with Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine helps clarify the relative sensitivities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, VOO and IWV have moved in close tandem because their returns are dominated by the same large-cap technology leaders. However, VOO has generally benefited from its higher technology weighting and greater concentration in the market's strongest-performing mega-cap stocks during periods of AI-led leadership. Its lower expense ratio also provides a small but persistent tailwind to net returns.

IWV, by contrast, offers incremental exposure to mid- and small-cap segments, which can enhance diversification and provide relative support during episodes of market broadening. Its higher fee and lower liquidity relative to VOO are the primary structural trade-offs. In terms of volatility, the two funds are broadly similar given their shared large-cap core, though IWV's small-cap slice can introduce slightly different drawdown behavior during risk-off periods.

How I Incorporate Tickeron’s AI Screener

When evaluating broad-market ETFs like these, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly compare technical patterns, volatility metrics, and AI-driven signals across similar vehicles. The tool allows filtering by market cap, sector exposure, and performance trends, which helps surface how VOO and IWV stack up against peers without manual effort. It has become a regular part of my process for refining core holdings.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: IWV, VOO

IWV in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026

IWV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 36 of 38 cases where IWV's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 42 of 49 cases where IWV's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

Following a +2.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IWV advanced for three days, in 269 of 338 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IWV as a result. In 66 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IWV turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 73%.

IWV moved below its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for IWV crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IWV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.

The Aroon Indicator for IWV entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO), Eli Lilly & Co (NYSE:LLY), JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM).

Industry description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of the Russell 3000® Index, which measures the performance of the broad U.S. equity market. The underlying index is a float-adjusted capitalization-weighted index of the approximately 2,939 largest public issuers domiciled in the U.S. and its territories, as determined by Russell. BFA uses a representative sampling indexing strategy to manage the fund.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) ETF is 37.04B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 15.62M to 5T. AAPL holds the highest valuation in this group at 5T. The lowest valued company is ACH at 15.62M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) ETF was -0%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was -3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 1%. APP experienced the highest price growth at 61%, while IHRT experienced the biggest fall at -70%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) ETF was -2%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was 16% and the average quarterly volume growth was -22%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 58
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 50
SMR Rating: 64
Profit Risk Rating: 72
Seasonality Score: 11 (-100 ... +100)
AI Screener 3
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Interact to see
Advertisement
AtlasClear Holdings (ATCH) shares fell roughly 25.5% over the last 30 days, declining from $0.1881 on October 2 to $0.1401 on October 30. The pullback extended a longer downtrend that has kept the stock trading well below the $1.00 NYSE American minimum, keeping continued listing-compliance risk in focus.
XRPN fell -9.70% in early regular-session trading on Tuesday, sliding from Monday's $10.41 close to $9.40. The decline follows a November 9 SEC prospectus disclosing a committed equity facility with Cantor to sell up to 5.2 million new Class A shares at 97% of the volume-weighted average price, implying up to roughly 16.7% potential dilution.
The $1.50 central target is a fallback objective drawn from public market and technical discussion, not an analyst consensus, because AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AQB) has no credible, current sell-side price targets. With the stock near $0.95, reaching $1.50 would require roughly 58% upside, a very large move for a company that has wound down its core aquaculture operations.
The central target of $1,620 is the arithmetic mean of verified, current analyst price targets, rounded to a clean level; it is not a single firm's forecast or a guarantee. At a recent price of about $690 , reaching $1,620 would require a gain of roughly 135% , a very large move by any standard.
NVDA fell -2.10% to $216.66 during regular trading, down from a prior close of $221.30. Primary catalyst: hotter-than-expected September CPI data reignited Fed rate-hike fears, raising borrowing costs for AI infrastructure buildouts.