Go to the list of all blogs
AI dvisor's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 05, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
IYR vs VNQ: Weighing Two Leading U.S. Real Estate ETFs

IYR vs VNQ: Weighing Two Leading U.S. Real Estate ETFs

Key Takeaways

  • Both IYR and VNQ provide diversified exposure to U.S. real estate, but they track different indexes and offer meaningfully different breadth and cost profiles.
  • IYR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index with roughly 62 holdings and a 0.37% expense ratio, giving it a more concentrated, large-cap tilt.
  • VNQ tracks the MSCI U.S. Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index with roughly 150 holdings and a 0.13% expense ratio, offering broader diversification at roughly one-third the cost.
  • Both funds are heavily weighted toward the same REITs (real estate investment trusts), including healthcare, data center, industrial, and cell tower operators, so their macro drivers are largely shared.
  • VNQ's materially larger asset base and lower fee make it the structurally more efficient vehicle for long-term core real estate allocation.
  • Tickeron AI Verdict: VNQ is the preferred choice on cost efficiency, diversification, and liquidity.

Why These ETFs Stand Out for Real Estate Exposure

When putting together a dedicated allocation to U.S. real estate, IYR and VNQ are two of the most widely held and frequently compared ETFs in the category. They are direct competitors: both are passively managed funds that hold U.S. REITs and real estate operating companies, and both are sensitive to the same interest-rate, supply-demand, and financing dynamics. Yet they are not identical. Their differences in index construction, number of holdings, and expense ratios create distinct exposure and positioning profiles that matter for cost-conscious and diversification-seeking investors alike. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the two compare within the broader real estate sector.

A Closer Look at IYR

IYR seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of U.S. real estate equities. The fund typically holds around 62 securities, concentrating its exposure in the sector's largest names. Its top holdings include healthcare REIT Welltower, industrial REIT Prologis, cell tower owner American Tower, mall operator Simon Property Group, data center operators Equinix and Digital Realty Trust, and net-lease REIT Realty Income.

Sector allocation is overwhelmingly real estate, with specialty REITs, residential, industrial, retail, and office subsectors comprising nearly all assets. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.37% and manages roughly $4 billion in assets. As a passive, index-based fund, IYR rebalances according to its capped-index methodology rather than through active manager discretion. Its smaller holdings count and higher fee make it a more concentrated, slightly pricier way to access U.S. property exposure.

A Closer Look at VNQ

VNQ seeks to track the MSCI U.S. Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, which covers publicly traded equity REITs and other real estate-related investments across the full market-cap spectrum. The fund holds approximately 150 securities, providing a broader sample of the property market than IYR. Its top holdings overlap heavily with IYR's—including Welltower, Prologis, Equinix, American Tower, and Simon Property Group—but at somewhat lower individual weights. The fund also holds a sizable position in the affiliated Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund as part of its structure.

Like IYR, VNQ is passive and index-based, but its 0.13% expense ratio is roughly one-third of IYR's, and its asset base of roughly $65 billion to $70 billion makes it the largest U.S. real estate ETF. This scale supports tight bid-ask spreads and deep liquidity. Because the 25/50 index caps any single issuer at 25% of assets and limits the total weight of issuers above 5%, VNQ maintains a somewhat more balanced, diversified profile across the real estate universe.

The Broader Industry Context

Both ETFs operate within the broader commercial real estate cycle, where monetary policy and long-term interest rates are the dominant drivers. REITs compete with bonds for income-oriented capital, so expectations around Federal Reserve policy influence valuations across the group. Structural themes such as data center demand tied to cloud computing and artificial intelligence, aging demographics supporting healthcare and senior-housing REITs, and the persistent shift toward e-commerce driving industrial and logistics demand have shaped relative performance in recent market cycles. Meanwhile, office and certain retail properties remain more sensitive to hybrid work trends and consumer behavior. These shared catalysts mean IYR and VNQ tend to move in tandem, with differences in breadth and concentration driving the modest variations in their returns.

How the Two Compare on Performance and Positioning

Over recent weeks and months, IYR and VNQ have tracked each other closely, as would be expected from two funds with substantially overlapping top holdings. Where they diverge, the differences tend to reflect index construction rather than fundamental disagreement. IYR's capped, large-cap-weighted index gives somewhat greater weight to the largest names, which can amplify returns during periods when mega-cap REITs lead. VNQ's broader, roughly 150-stock portfolio includes more mid- and small-cap property companies, offering slightly greater diversification and potentially smoother relative positioning during periods of narrow leadership. Neither fund uses leverage or derivatives for return enhancement, so their volatility profiles remain comparable. Cost differentials, however, favor VNQ over time, as a lower expense ratio compounds into a meaningful advantage across longer holding periods.

AI Tools in Portfolio Analysis

In my research process, I regularly use Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare ETFs like these two on factors such as holdings breadth, expense ratios, liquidity metrics, and sector overlap. The tool allows quick filtering across thousands of securities using technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance data, which helps confirm that VNQ’s structural advantages stand out clearly when screening real estate funds. It streamlines the kind of side-by-side evaluation that would otherwise take much longer manually.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor VNQ over IYR. VNQ offers a materially lower expense ratio (0.13% versus 0.37%), a broader portfolio of roughly 150 holdings versus about 62, and a substantially larger asset base that supports deeper liquidity and tighter trading spreads. Its index methodology also produces a more balanced distribution of risk across issuers. While both funds provide similar core exposure to U.S. real estate and share the same macro drivers, VNQ's combination of cost efficiency, diversification, and structural scale gives it the more compelling profile for a long-term core allocation. This assessment is probabilistic and reflects current fund characteristics rather than a forecast of short-term price moves.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: IYR, VNQ

IYR's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for IYR moved out of oversold territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 25 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 22 of the 25 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on IYR as a result. In 66 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for IYR just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where IYR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

IYR moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for IYR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 13 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.

Following a +1.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IYR advanced for three days, in 255 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

The 50-day moving average for IYR moved below the 200-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IYR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

IYR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for IYR entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are PROLOGIS (NYSE:PLD), American Tower Corp (NYSE:AMT), Simon Property Group (NYSE:SPG), Zillow Group (NASDAQ:Z).

Industry description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index. The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index, which measures the performance of the real estate sector of the U.S. equity market, as defined by the "index provider". It generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of its underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of its underlying index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) ETF is 23.06B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 4.62B to 173.78B. WELL holds the highest valuation in this group at 173.78B. The lowest valued company is CUZ at 4.62B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) ETF was 18%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 36%, and the average quarterly price growth was 18%. JLL experienced the highest price growth at 25%, while USD experienced the biggest fall at -14%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) ETF was 3%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was 9% and the average quarterly volume growth was -21%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 75
P/E Growth Rating: 59
Price Growth Rating: 49
SMR Rating: 73
Profit Risk Rating: 76
Seasonality Score: 29 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category RealEstate

Category
Real Estate
Address
iShares Trust400 Howard StreetSan Francisco
Phone
415-670-2000
Web
www.ishares.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
Operating profit rose to £2.0 billion in Q1 2026, up from the prior year period. Basic earnings per share (EPS) increased 15.5% year-over-year to 17.9 pence.
Analysts expect first quarter 2026 EPS of $1.67, a decline from prior year, though recent revisions trend higher. Revenue consensus stands at $9.79 billion, up 12.3% year-over-year, supported by stronger oil prices.