Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 12, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
Lithium Americas (LAC) Swings to Q3 Profit but Thacker Pass Costs Climb to $3.83 Billion

Lithium Americas (LAC) Swings to Q3 Profit but Thacker Pass Costs Climb to $3.83 Billion

Key Takeaways

  • Lithium Americas reported third-quarter 2026 net income of $90.1 million, compared with a net loss of $199.2 million in the same period a year earlier.
  • The swing to profitability was driven largely by non-cash fair-value gains on financial instruments, not operating revenue — the company remains pre-revenue as it builds its Thacker Pass project.
  • Basic net income per share came in at $0.19, while diluted net loss per share was $0.05, reflecting the effect of outstanding convertible instruments.
  • Management raised the Thacker Pass Phase 1 capital cost estimate to $3.83 billion, up from the prior $2.93 billion estimate, citing tariffs, logistics, and labor cost inflation.
  • The company flagged an incremental funding requirement of roughly $995 million, expected to be met through a $650 million company contribution and reserve-account funds.
  • Cash and restricted cash totaled approximately $1.3 billion as of September 30, 2026, providing a substantial liquidity buffer during peak construction.

Why the Quarter Matters

Lithium Americas is still a development-stage company focused on advancing the Thacker Pass lithium project in Nevada. That site is viewed as a key domestic source of battery-grade lithium carbonate. With no revenue yet, quarterly results hinge more on construction updates, cost management, and funding than on traditional earnings metrics. The jump in the Phase 1 capital estimate to $3.83 billion therefore stands out as the main takeaway, especially with mechanical completion still targeted for late 2027.

Results at a Glance

For the quarter ended September 30, 2026, Lithium Americas posted net income of $90.1 million versus the $199.2 million net loss from a year earlier. Basic earnings per share reached $0.19 while the diluted figure showed a $0.05 loss. Those headline numbers stem mainly from non-cash fair-value gains on warrants and convertibles rather than any operating improvement.

The bigger disclosure was the revised Thacker Pass Phase 1 budget, lifted to $3.83 billion including contingency. Management tied roughly $100 million of the increase to tariffs and logistics, about $150 million to craft labor wage inflation, and around $245 million to higher labor installation rates, with the rest linked to engineering, procurement, and added contingency. Cash and restricted cash stood at roughly $1.3 billion at quarter-end, including $359.5 million at the joint-venture level. Construction safety and progress metrics remained solid, with detailed engineering complete and procurement more than 90 percent finished.

Market Reaction

Investor sentiment was already tempered by earlier concerns over rising costs and lithium price swings. The reported profit provided a surface-level positive, yet the roughly $900 million increase in capital needs and the $995 million incremental funding requirement drew more attention. Because the earnings are non-cash and one-time in nature, focus has stayed on project execution and balance-sheet strength. The company’s plan to cover the extra funding through a $650 million contribution plus reserve accounts is now a central point for how the market views the update.

Key Items to Monitor Ahead

Execution at Thacker Pass remains the primary driver. The company has kept its late-2027 mechanical completion target, so investors will track milestones such as structural steel, concrete work, and utility energization through the rest of 2026. Cost control will matter equally, given peak spending in fiscal 2026 and the higher capital estimate. Lithium carbonate pricing trends will also influence long-term project economics once production starts, while liquidity, loan advances, and any shifts in the joint-venture structure with General Motors and the Department of Energy stay on the watch list.

Checking Comparable Names with AI Tools

When reviewing development-stage materials companies like this one, I sometimes run quick screens to see how peers stack up on technical patterns and fundamentals. One resource I turn to for that is Tickeron’s AI Screener, which lets users apply filters across industries and surface ideas based on volatility, trends, and AI signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: LAC

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


LAC in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on November 11, 2026

LAC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 32 of 38 cases where LAC's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for LAC's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

Following a +9.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LAC advanced for three days, in 184 of 245 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LAC as a result. In 73 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for LAC turned negative on November 11, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 84%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LAC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.

The Aroon Indicator for LAC entered a downward trend on November 11, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 16 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.494) is normal, around the industry mean (6.813). P/E Ratio (-4.289) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-0.701). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.026). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (283.864).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. LAC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LAC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are BHP Group Limited (NYSE:BHP), Vale SA (NYSE:VALE).

Industry description

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Other Metals/Minerals Industry is 7.67B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 11 to 286.66B. RTNTF holds the highest valuation in this group at 286.66B. The lowest valued company is UNEQ at 11.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Other Metals/Minerals Industry was -1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -46%. ELVR experienced the highest price growth at 23%, while EMAT experienced the biggest fall at -34%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Other Metals/Minerals Industry was -28%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 3% and the average quarterly volume growth was -55%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 46
P/E Growth Rating: 45
Price Growth Rating: 74
SMR Rating: 92
Profit Risk Rating: 91
Seasonality Score: -2 (-100 ... +100)
AI Screener 4
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry OtherMetalsMinerals

Industry
N/A
Address
666 Burrard Street
Phone
+1 778 656-5820
Employees
94
Web
https://www.lithiumamericas.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZ dropped sharply, sliding from a $16.72 prior close to $13.48 (-19.38%), with the decline beginning in premarket and deepening into the early regular session. No verified company-specific news or fundamental catalyst was issued; the fall tracked a broad China ADR selloff (the Nasdaq Golden Dragon index slid more than 2%), but that alone is too small to explain a ~20% drop — the stock's Hong Kong listing fell only -2.6%.
NBIS fell from $154.69 to $129.12, down -16.53%, with the decline starting in premarket trading and continuing through the regular session. The drop followed Q3 results: revenue of $980.8M (+571% YoY) beat estimates, but management cut 2026 revenue guidance to the low end of its range on third-party capacity delays and raised 2026 capex to roughly $27B, reviving financing and execution fears.
The $1.14 central target is not an analyst consensus; it is the all-cash merger consideration in GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) 's pending deal with Starman Optical, agreed in September 2026. With the stock trading near $0.88, reaching $1.14 would require a move of roughly 29.5%.
The central target of $21 is the arithmetic mean of three recently attributable analyst price targets on RUM — $25 (Lake Street), $15 (Texas Capital), and $22 (Maxim Group) — which average roughly $20.67. With shares trading near $5.90 after a post-earnings surge, reaching $21 would require a gain of roughly 256%, a very large move.
The $1 target in this article is not an analyst price target; it is the $1.00 Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement, the level Cenntro itself has publicly targeted through a 1-for-60 reverse stock split. Cenntro trades near $0.12 per share, meaning reaching $1 would require an increase of roughly 730%—an exceptionally large move.