MasTec (MTZ) and MYR Group (MYRG) both stand to benefit from the ongoing expansion of the electrical grid, clean energy projects, and the infrastructure needed for data centers and broader electrification. They share similar long-term tailwinds, yet their stock performances have moved in noticeably different directions lately. This makes for a useful comparison when evaluating relative strength, positioning, and how market sentiment can shift even among companies in the same sector.
MTZ, or MasTec, Inc., operates across communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipeline segments. Recent results showed solid momentum, with record revenue and an 18-month backlog that topped $24 billion, driven in part by growth in the Power Delivery segment tied to grid and data center work. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Even so, the shares pulled back sharply after reaching a 52-week high near $441. The drop reached roughly 60% from that peak, reflecting a valuation reset and broader concerns after the November elections around potential limits on data center development and changes to certain tax benefits. Softness in communications and some margin pressure in pipelines added to the caution, even while the backlog stayed robust.
MYRG, or MYR Group Inc., focuses on transmission and distribution work for utilities as well as commercial and industrial projects, including some data center exposure. Its latest quarter stood out, with revenue rising about 32% year over year to a record level, EPS beating estimates, and operating margins expanding. Backlog also hit a new high, helped by acquisitions like Valley Electric and Comet Electric, and the company launched a $100 million share repurchase program.
Unlike MTZ, MYRG shares advanced on these results and drew upgrades, including a Strong Buy rating and an Overweight call that highlighted its lighter data center exposure and more attractive valuation after sector swings. While execution risks remain, the earnings strength and narrower policy sensitivity have supported steadier performance.
The companies differ in size and focus. MTZ is larger and more diversified, with meaningful pipeline and communications exposure, while MYRG is more concentrated on utility T&D and C&I work. Both gain from electrification trends, but MTZ’s heavier data center tilt left it more exposed to the recent post-election repricing. MYRG’s lighter concentration helped it sidestep much of that pressure and attract positive analyst attention.
On momentum, MYRG holds the edge with its earnings beat, rising backlog, and upward revisions. MTZ’s fundamentals look solid, yet its price sits in a corrective phase where technical levels and free cash flow remain key watchpoints. Risks differ too: MTZ faces communications softness and timing issues, while MYRG deals with integration from recent deals. Overall, the valuation reset hit MTZ harder despite similar sector exposure.
Based on the factors at hand, Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MYRG over MTZ. MYRG shows stronger trend consistency, better recent earnings momentum, positive revisions, and less vulnerability to the policy concerns that weighed on its peer. MTZ’s backlog and growth remain intact, but the broken near-term trend and valuation reset add uncertainty that the model weighs against it. This view is probabilistic and can shift with new catalysts.
When comparing names like these, I often review Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify which automated strategies align best with current conditions. The page curates bots that have shown strong recent fit to prevailing market dynamics, giving a practical starting point for traders without needing to scan the full catalog. Each bot follows its own methodology, so styles and results vary, which can be useful when weighing relative opportunities across infrastructure stocks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MTZ turned positive on October 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where MTZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MTZ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 52 cases where MTZ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +18.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MTZ advanced for three days, in 278 of 351 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
MTZ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MTZ as a result. In 57 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MTZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for MTZ entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 46 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 57 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.021) is normal, around the industry mean (15.143). P/E Ratio (27.461) is within average values for comparable stocks, (167.534). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.616) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.215) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.103) is also within normal values, averaging (2.886).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MTZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MTZ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a infrastructure construction company
Industry EngineeringConstruction