GET DAILY SIGNALSMTZ vs PWR: Weighing MasTec and Quanta Services in the Infrastructure Buildout
Key Takeaways
- Both MTZ and PWR are North American specialty infrastructure contractors leveraged to electrification, grid modernization, and data-center power demand, but they differ sharply in scale and recent momentum.
- PWR delivered a record third quarter with revenue up roughly 57% and a $64 billion backlog, while MTZ posted a net-income decline and trimmed its 2026 profit outlook.
- MTZ has traded in a pronounced downtrend in recent weeks, whereas PWR has sustained stronger relative performance and analyst support.
- Valuations diverge: MTZ trades at a lower forward earnings multiple, while PWR commands a premium reflecting its stronger margins and cash flow.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: PWR (Quanta Services) is the favored ticker of the two.
- For further detail, explore MTZ Major News and MTZ Today's Price Move, along with PWR Major News and PWR Today's Price Move.
- Interested in automated strategies? Explore Trending AI Robots to see which trading bots are currently best suited to market conditions.
Why These Contractors Stand Out
MasTec and Quanta Services rank among the leading publicly traded infrastructure contractors in North America. They often bid on similar projects involving electric transmission and distribution, grid upgrades, renewable energy, and large-scale utility work. Both benefit from the same long-term drivers around rising power demand and data-center expansion, yet their latest results and price action have moved in different directions. This makes for a useful side-by-side look at how two companies in the same space are navigating current conditions.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MTZ, or MasTec, Inc., operates out of Coral Gables, Florida, with segments in communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipeline infrastructure. The stock has pulled back noticeably from its spring levels, driven more by margin and timing issues than any drop in underlying demand. Revenue in the latest quarter rose nearly 30 percent year over year, but net income fell amid higher interest costs after the July acquisition of The Superior Group and a decline in operating margin from 6.3 percent to 5.1 percent. Management pointed to roughly 60-day permitting delays in pipeline projects and reduced its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance. Backlog still hit a record near $24.5 billion, and the company paused a major acquisition to focus on share repurchases, showing attention to capital allocation. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
PWR, or Quanta Services, Inc., is based in Houston and focuses on electric power, renewables, and underground utilities, positioning it as the largest U.S. provider of electric transmission and distribution contracting. Its third-quarter results stood out, with revenue climbing about 57 percent year over year to roughly $12 billion, adjusted EPS rising around 82 percent, and backlog reaching a record $64 billion. Management lifted full-year guidance on revenue, EBITDA, and EPS, while free cash flow also set a new high. The company improved its balance sheet and announced plans to expand transformer manufacturing capacity, supporting its integrated model. These factors have helped sustain analyst support and steadier share performance. From what I see, the momentum here looks more consistent right now.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Scale sets the two apart immediately: Quanta’s market capitalization is about six times larger than MasTec’s, giving it more capacity for extended utility programs. Both ride the same tailwinds from electrification and data-center needs, but Quanta’s heavier weighting toward electric power has delivered faster revenue growth and margin expansion, while MasTec’s broader mix across communications and pipelines has created some near-term friction. Price action reflects the difference, with Quanta holding up better and MasTec in a corrective phase. On risk, MasTec carries higher leverage post-acquisition and faces segment-specific execution questions, whereas Quanta’s premium valuation comes with the working-capital demands of big construction projects. Analyst views remain generally positive on both, though slightly more guarded on MasTec’s near-term earnings path.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on the factors at hand, Tickeron’s AI currently favors PWR over MTZ. Quanta’s accelerating revenue, expanding backlog, margin gains, and raised guidance point to stronger trend consistency and better relative positioning. MasTec still holds a large backlog and benefits from the same sector drivers, yet recent margin pressure, the trimmed profit outlook, and softer price action suggest less stable near-term momentum. The probabilistic edge therefore leans toward Quanta Services, while recognizing that both names share exposure to broader industry catalysts and risks. I’m watching this closely as the sector evolves.
Exploring Automated Strategies
When evaluating names like these, I find it helpful to layer in quantitative tools alongside traditional analysis. Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots offer a range of automated approaches that can complement manual research by scanning for patterns and executing data-driven rules across various timeframes and styles. This can be especially useful when comparing two stocks that operate in overlapping markets but show different momentum profiles.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
MTZ's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MTZ turned positive on October 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where MTZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MTZ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 52 cases where MTZ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +18.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MTZ advanced for three days, in 278 of 351 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
MTZ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MTZ as a result. In 57 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MTZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for MTZ entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 46 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 57 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.021) is normal, around the industry mean (15.143). P/E Ratio (27.461) is within average values for comparable stocks, (167.534). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.616) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.215) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.103) is also within normal values, averaging (2.886).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MTZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MTZ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
a infrastructure construction company
Industry EngineeringConstruction
Advertisement