NP has moved within a tight band lately. After reaching the mid-$34 area in August, the shares retreated into the high-$20s by late September and have held steady between roughly $27 and $29 since. Over the past 30 days the price has eased about 1.5%, from around $28.63 to approximately $28.21. The action looks like normal consolidation after the first anniversary of the IPO rather than any major shift in sentiment.
Market capitalization sits near $4.05 billion, and the stock trades at a trailing P/E in the low-to-mid 120s, which is typical for a fast-growing specialty insurer. Attention stays on the company's strong profitability and its capacity to keep adding premium even while housing and catastrophe markets remain quiet. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Neptune Insurance Holdings, parent of Neptune Flood Incorporated, operates as an AI-native managing general agent based in St. Petersburg, Florida. It offers residential and commercial flood and earthquake coverage—primary and excess flood, parametric earthquake, and indemnity earthquake—through a national network of independent agencies. Policies are underwritten for carrier partners rather than on the company's own balance sheet.
The main advantage comes from the proprietary Triton platform, which manages underwriting, pricing, and issuance without traditional underwriters. With only about 60 employees, the lean setup produced roughly $3.2 million in revenue per employee over the trailing twelve months. The firm works with 45 capacity providers across 8 programs and 11 products covering more than $150 billion in total limits and ranks as the largest private flood insurer in the U.S. by premium.
The standout event was the third-quarter 2026 earnings release. Revenue climbed 34% year over year to $59.6 million, adjusted EBITDA rose 38% to a record $36.8 million, and net income increased 50% to $17.3 million. Premium in force reached $450.3 million (up 32%), while policies in force grew 29% to about 336,000. New business premium advanced 51% despite soft housing conditions and another year without a major hurricane.
Management raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance for the fourth time, now targeting $204 million with an adjusted EBITDA margin above 61%, and provided initial 2027 guidance of roughly $238 million. The AI assistant tool Atlas+ was used by about 7,000 agents in the quarter, and quotes involving the platform bound at 3.5 times the rate of those without it. Debt was reduced by $25 million, bringing net leverage down to around 1.7 times. From what I see, the NFIP extension through December 11, 2026, continues to steer agents toward private options, which supports Neptune. The indemnity earthquake product remains in beta testing ahead of a planned fourth-quarter launch.
Several items will influence the path forward. The formal rollout of the indemnity earthquake product could expand the addressable market beyond flood. Ongoing NFIP reauthorization debates and the December 2026 deadline remain important, as past uncertainty has consistently shifted agents to private coverage.
Investors will also track housing activity, hurricane developments, and any changes at FEMA or the NFIP that affect pricing. The 2027 revenue target of about $238 million assumes no housing rebound and no above-average storm season, so success will hinge on distribution growth and AI-driven efficiency. A slight drop in revenue retention to around 89%, versus the low-90s a year earlier, plus the premium valuation, are other points to monitor alongside the consensus view of continued expansion.
When I review names like this, I often cross-check signals with Tickeron's AI Trading Bots to see how systematic strategies line up with my own views. The platform surfaces a range of automated approaches across different timeframes and risk levels, which can help highlight patterns that might otherwise be missed in manual work.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Oscillator for NP moved out of oversold territory on October 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 13 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 10 of the 13 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NP as a result. In 14 of 21 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NP just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where NP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 11 of 16 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Following a +1.50% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NP advanced for three days, in 71 of 95 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 10-day moving average for NP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 5 of 6 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
NP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NP entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 76 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: NP's P/B Ratio (-18.210) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (2.512). NP's P/E Ratio (135.979) is considerably higher than the industry average of (17.714). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.910) is also within normal values, averaging (8.322). Dividend Yield (0.059) settles around the average of (0.046) among similar stocks. NP's P/S Ratio (23.041) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.968).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a company which engages in producing fine, technical papers and packaging
Industry InsuranceBrokersServices