Go to the list of all blogs
Harry Richardson's Avatar
published in Blogs
Dec 09, 2020
NetApp Breaks Out of 2-Year Downward Trend

NetApp Breaks Out of 2-Year Downward Trend

Some investors prefer to focus on fundamental analysis while others prefer technical analysis. Still others prefer to use a combination of the two analysis styles. This is where Tickeron falls, using both analysis styles. In our opinion, technical factors tend to have a greater influence over the short term while fundamentals are more important over the long run.

Sometimes we see stocks with good fundamentals that enter a downward trend and have a hard time breaking out of it. That is what happened with computer hardware manufacturer NetApp (NTAP). NetApp peaked up near $82 back in September ’18—the prices on the chart below are adjusted for dividend payments. The downward cycle started and over time a trend channel formed that defined the different cycles within the overall downward trend. The stock would eventually hit a low of $33.50 back in March.

The rally off of the March low has moved NetApp back above $60 and it appears that the most recent pop has moved the stock out of the downwardly sloped channel it was caught in for two years.

I have written about NetApp several times over the last few years and I can tell you that the fundamental indicators have been good during this whole time—even as the stock was trending lower. From an article I wrote in November ’18, I can tell you that the company was averaging EPS growth of 21% per year and was expected to see earnings grow by 24% in fiscal 2019.

NetApp’s profitability measurements at the time were impressive. The return on equity was 40.6% and the profit margin was at 19.6%. The operating margin was at 17.15% back then and that was above average compared to other companies.

Flash forward to the current readings and we see that the ROE is at 141.7%, the profit margin is at 20.9%, and the operating margin is 16.6%. These are all still at very impressive levels and instead of a P/E ratio up at 94 like it was in 2018, the P/E ratio is under 20 now.

The decline in the stock caused the sentiment to shift from a slightly bearish position to an extremely bearish position over the last two years. From the article in 2018 I can tell you that there were 29 analysts following the stock with 14 “buy” ratings, 13 “hold” ratings, and two “sell” ratings. At this time there are 27 analysts covering the stock with eight “buy” ratings, 17 “hold” ratings, and two “sell” ratings. The buy percentage dropped from 48.3% to 29.6%.

Short sellers have also increased their bearish posture. In November ’18 the short interest ratio was 3.89 and now it is 8.4. The average short interest ratio falls in the 3.0 range, so the reading from two years ago was slightly higher than average and the current reading is tremendously higher than average.

In addition to the factors listed above, TIckeron's AI platform found additional bullish signals for the stock. 

Related Ticker: NTAP

Contributor

Harry Richardson — Algorithmic Trader & Strategy Developer Harry is an algorithmic trader specializing in impulse and breakout trading strategies across cryptocurrency and equity markets. With more than 10 years of experience in developing automated trading systems, he focuses on building structured algorithms designed to capture momentum while maintaining strict risk control. His approach combines quantitative analysis, real-market execution, and continuous performance monitoring. Vitalii prioritizes risk management, drawdown control, and strategy stability over short-term optimization, ensuring algorithms are adaptable to changing market conditions. He has developed and tested hundreds of automated strategies, working extensively with live trading environments, forward testing, and portfolio-level algorithm management. His work centers on transforming trading ideas into fully operational, scalable automated systems.


NTAP sees MACD Histogram crosses below signal line

NTAP saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on August 20, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for NTAP moved out of overbought territory on August 19, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 47 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 24, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NTAP as a result. In of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NTAP declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

NTAP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NTAP advanced for three days, in of 314 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 289 cases where NTAP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. NTAP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (26.596) is normal, around the industry mean (22.477). P/E Ratio (28.844) is within average values for comparable stocks, (121.995). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.060) is also within normal values, averaging (2.051). Dividend Yield (0.011) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.316) is also within normal values, averaging (109.588).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Oracle Corp (NYSE:ORCL), Palo Alto Networks Inc (NASDAQ:PANW), Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:CRWD), Block Inc (NYSE:XYZ), NetApp (NASDAQ:NTAP), Twilio (NYSE:TWLO), MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB), Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA), Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS).

Industry description

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Computer Communications Industry is 35.3B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 42.77K to 3.72T. MSFT holds the highest valuation in this group at 3.72T. The lowest valued company is YYAI at 42.77K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Computer Communications Industry was -1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 14%. CYAB experienced the highest price growth at 65%, while WETO experienced the biggest fall at -79%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Computer Communications Industry was 18%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 13% and the average quarterly volume growth was 13%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 48
P/E Growth Rating: 71
Price Growth Rating: 55
SMR Rating: 79
Profit Risk Rating: 91
Seasonality Score: -16 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
NTAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Provides data management and storage solutions

Industry ComputerCommunications

Profile
Details
Industry
Computer Peripherals
Address
3060 Olsen Drive
Phone
+1 408 822-6000
Employees
11700
Web
https://www.netapp.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARRY beat Q4 revenue expectations but showed a sharp year‑over‑year sales decline and a sizeable net loss. Adjusted EBITDA for Q4 badly missed Wall Street estimates, highlighting ongoing margin and cost pressures. 2026 guidance for EPS and EBITDA came in well below analyst forecasts, signaling weaker‑than‑hoped earnings power over the next year.
C3.ai (AI) dropped more than 18% today after delivering a deeply disappointing quarterly report, slashing its revenue outlook, and announcing mass layoffs, which together reinforced doubts about its growth story in an increasingly competitive AI software market.
On the surface, PRCT’s top line still grew: Q4 2025 revenue reached about 76.4 million dollars, up roughly 11.9–12% from the prior year. However, analysts had expected something closer to 94–96 million dollars, so the shortfall of nearly 20% was significant for a high‑growth med‑tech name.
Payoneer Global (PAYO) fell more than 18% today after it missed Wall Street expectations on both Q4 2025 revenue and earnings, and issued softer‑than‑hoped guidance that reinforced concerns about slowing growth and competitive pressure in cross‑border fintech.
Gold, uranium, and rare earth stocks are moving fast in 2026 — and this 15-minute AI Trading Agent is built to move faster. Designed for high-beta Mining & Metals leaders like NEM, LEU, MP, and KGC, it transforms commodity volatility into structured, data-driven opportunity with institutional-grade risk control.
In a market where milliseconds matter and emotional decisions cost fortunes, a new class of AI-driven trading tools is rewriting the rulebook. Meet the HUBB, AVGO, ITA, QQQ – Trading Results AI Trading Agent (4 Tickers, 5min) — a precision-engineered robot that monitors four strategically selected tickers across semiconductors, industrial power infrastructure, aerospace & defense, and broad tech growth.
Q4 2025 gross profit grew about 24% year over year to roughly 2.87 billion dollars, with Cash App gross profit up about 33% and Square gross profit up around 7%. Adjusted operating income jumped to about 588 million dollars in Q4 (around a 20% margin), up strongly from the prior year. For the full year, gross profit was roughly 10.36 billion dollars, up about 17% year over year, showing broad‑based growth across the business.
NVDA shares declined 5.47% on Thursday, February 26, 2026, closing at $184.87, down from the prior session close of approximately $195.56. The primary catalyst was a "sell the news" reaction to Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings that beat estimates on every headline metric but failed to ignite meaningful buying interest.
Shares of UHS fell approximately 9.15% on February 26, 2026, closing near $209.62, down from a prior close of $230.73. The primary catalyst was a mixed Q4 2025 earnings report: adjusted EPS of $5.88 missed the consensus estimate of $5.92, and revenue of $4.49 billion fell short of the $4.50–$4.51 billion analyst forecast.
HEI shares fell approximately 9.21% on February 26, 2026, closing at $312.98 versus a prior close near $344.72. The primary catalyst was HEICO's Q1 fiscal 2026 earnings report, which delivered headline beats on EPS and revenue but disappointed investors on margin quality, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash flow generation.
IONQ surged +21.70% on February 26, 2026, closing at $40.88 versus the prior session's close of $33.59. The primary catalyst was a powerful Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings beat, with annual revenue of $130 million coming in 20% above guidance and representing 202% year-over-year growth.
Shares of CRWV declined approximately 11.38% in Friday's session, falling from a prior close of $97.63 to around $86.52, after the company reported Q4 2025 earnings after the bell on Thursday, February 26. The primary catalyst was a wider-than-expected net loss of $0.56 per share on EPS expectations of −$0.49, alongside a massive capex plan calling for $30–$35 billion in infrastructure spending in 2026, more than doubling the prior year.
DELL shares surged 16.64% during Friday's session, last trading around $141.65, up from the prior close of $121.45. The primary catalyst was a blowout Q4 fiscal year 2026 earnings report, with revenue of $33.4 billion — up 39% year-over-year — beating consensus estimates by roughly $2 billion.
Stifel Financial (SF) appears to be down over 30% on your screen today primarily because its shares began trading split‑adjusted following a three‑for‑two stock split (a 50% stock dividend), not because of a sudden collapse in the company’s fundamentals. After the split, the per‑share price is mechanically lower, even though the underlying value of the business has not changed.
Sunrun (RUN) sank more than 35–37% today even after posting a massive Q4 beat because its outlook and strategic commentary signaled slower volume growth, tighter financing conditions, and a more defensive stance on 2026, which together triggered a sharp reset in already‑volatile solar sentiment.
PAR Technology Corp. (PAR) dropped more than 28% today after its latest earnings report, even though it beat on revenue and EPS, because investors focused on weak profitability, continued operating losses, and a wave of sharply lower analyst price targets that signaled reduced confidence in the stock’s near‑term upside.
Carter’s (CRI) dropped more than 21% today because, even though it beat Q4 expectations on both sales and earnings, management issued a much weaker 2026 earnings outlook, highlighted ongoing margin pressure from tariffs and product costs, and guided to a sharp near‑term EPS drop that jarred investors.
WES is an oil & gas midstream partnership (NYSE: WES) with largely fee‑based, long‑term volume contracts in key basins such as the Delaware and DJ, which insulate cash flows from direct oil price swings but still tie them to producer activity and throughput. Current positioning: The units trade around 41–42 dollars with a high cash yield (roughly 9% dividend), solid profitability (P/E about 14), and strong returns on equity above 40%, signaling a mature, cash‑generative infrastructure asset.
SD is a pure‑play upstream energy company with operations concentrated in U.S. onshore oil and gas, so its revenues are directly influenced by global oil and gas price movements.
TTI is an oilfield services and specialty chemicals company, not a direct oil producer, so it tends to benefit when higher oil prices lead to sustained drilling and completion activity rather than from price moves alone. The Iran war raises the odds of major supply disruptions, and several commentators see a path to Brent near 100 dollars per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz is impaired, which would support energy capex and, by extension, demand for TTI’s services and fluids.