Perella Weinberg Partners is a leading global independent advisory firm whose revenue is largely tied to the completion of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and other advisory engagements. Because advisory fees are earned deal by deal, quarterly results can swing sharply from period to period. The third quarter of 2026 is notable because it reverses a first-half slowdown: first-quarter revenue fell 30% year over year, and the second quarter rose just 1%. This report matters to investors because it tests whether the firm's aggressive talent investments and its recent Gleacher Shacklock acquisition are translating into fee growth. A strong quarter would also confirm management's expectation that 2026 revenue would be weighted toward the back half of the year. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Perella Weinberg reported third quarter 2026 revenue of $251.4 million, a 53% increase from $164.6 million a year earlier and a 61% sequential gain. The top line comfortably exceeded the roughly $182.8 million consensus estimate compiled from S&P-surveyed analysts. Growth was driven by a higher number of fee-paying clients and a greater share of fee events exceeding $5 million, with particular strength in the consumer, industrials, energy, and financial institutions practices.
On the bottom line, adjusted EPS reached $0.39, a significant beat versus the approximately $0.15 consensus. GAAP diluted EPS was $0.21, while GAAP pre-tax income was $35 million and adjusted pre-tax income was $56 million. For the first nine months of 2026, revenue totaled $556.8 million, up 5% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $0.63. Management noted that $55 million of third-quarter revenue related to closings that occurred in the first days of the fourth quarter but were recorded in the third quarter under relevant accounting rules.
Investors responded positively to the report. Shares of PWP jumped roughly 12% in the morning session following the release, reflecting both the size of the revenue and EPS beats and management's upbeat commentary on the deal pipeline. Sentiment had been pressured earlier in the year by a slower first half, and the stock entered the report down about 18.7% since the start of 2026. The strong quarter, combined with a backlog that nearly tripled year over year, helped restore confidence in the firm's growth trajectory. Even so, the stock remains well below its 52-week high, suggesting investors are still weighing broader factors such as interest-rate expectations and the timing of deal closings.
Looking ahead, the firm's most important forward indicator is its announced and pending backlog, which stood at nearly three times the prior-year level at quarter end. Management indicated that a meaningful portion of this backlog is expected to convert into revenue over the next one to two quarters, providing visibility into early 2027. Investors will want to watch whether this pipeline converts on schedule, since advisory revenue can shift between periods if deal closings are delayed.
Margin discipline remains another area of focus. The adjusted compensation ratio held at 67% for the first nine months, in line with the firm's full-year target, while adjusted non-compensation expenses fell 14% from a year ago. Sustaining these expense controls while continuing to hire partners and managing directors will be central to profitability. The firm added fourteen partners and thirteen managing directors year to date, a notable investment in future fee-generating capacity.
Finally, the integration of Gleacher Shacklock and any future talent additions or selective acquisitions will shape the growth story. Rising interest rates and the broader M&A environment also bear watching, since higher financing costs can influence deal activity. The firm's debt-free balance sheet and $150 million cash position provide flexibility as management balances strategic investment with shareholder returns. From what I see, the results point to a solid setup heading into year-end.
In my view, tools like Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine can be useful when evaluating advisory firms such as PWP amid shifting market conditions. I ran a quick scan to cross-check sector trends and pattern signals, which helped confirm some of the momentum I was already seeing in the backlog data. This kind of AI-assisted review fits naturally into a broader research process without replacing traditional fundamental work.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PWP's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +3.19% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWP advanced for three days, in 220 of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
PWP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PWP as a result. In 63 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PWP turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 81%.
PWP moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for PWP entered a downward trend on October 28, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 76 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: PWP's P/B Ratio (-21.848) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.583). P/E Ratio (40.438) is within average values for comparable stocks, (8.519). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.022) settles around the average of (7.168) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.119) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. PWP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PWP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers