PFF vs PFFD: Weighing Two Leading Preferred-Stock ETFs

Key Takeaways

• Both PFF and PFFD are passively managed ETFs targeting U.S. preferred securities, but they track different underlying indexes and carry meaningfully different cost structures.
• PFF is the larger, more established fund with roughly 455 holdings, while PFFD is smaller and more concentrated at roughly 225–239 holdings.
• PFFD charges an expense ratio of 0.23%, less than half of PFF's 0.45%, a durable cost advantage for income-focused investors.
• Both funds are heavily weighted toward financial institutions, though PFFD's financial exposure (about 71%) is higher than PFF's (about 56%).
• As preferred-stock strategies, both are highly sensitive to interest rate expectations and credit conditions, making relative positioning a key driver of performance.
• Tickeron AI Verdict: PFFD — its comparable exposure at a substantially lower cost gives it the structural edge.

The Appeal of Preferred-Stock ETFs

Preferred-stock ETFs have regained attention as investors seek yield amid shifting interest rate expectations and uneven equity market breadth. PFF and PFFD sit at the center of this conversation as the two most prominent U.S. preferred securities funds. They compete directly: both aim to capture the hybrid income profile of preferred shares, which combine bond-like fixed dividends with stock-like equity exposure. Yet their benchmark selection, portfolio breadth, and fee structure diverge in ways that materially affect long-term outcomes. For income-oriented investors weighing these two funds, understanding those structural differences — rather than short-term price moves — is essential to making an informed ETF comparison.

A Closer Look at PFF

PFF is a passive ETF that seeks to track the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Launched in 2007, it is the largest and most liquid fund in the preferred-stock category, with assets under management (AUM) in the range of $13–16 billion. The fund holds roughly 455–464 securities, providing broad, market-value-weighted exposure across the U.S. preferred and hybrid securities universe. The portfolio is concentrated in financial institutions (about 56%), followed by industrial issuers (about 31%) and utilities (about 11%). Top holdings include preferred issues from Boeing, Strategy Inc., Alphabet, Wells Fargo, Oracle, Super Micro Computer, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Bank of America. Its expense ratio is 0.45%. Because the underlying index includes hybrid and convertible-style securities, PFF carries slightly broader structural diversity than pure fixed-rate preferred funds, though it remains dominated by financial-sector credit risk.

Understanding PFFD

PFFD is a passive ETF that seeks to track the ICE BofA Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. Launched in 2017 and issued by Global X, it holds roughly 225–239 preferred securities, making it more concentrated than PFF while still spanning the broad preferred market. Its assets under management are approximately $2.1 billion. The fund's distinguishing feature is cost: its expense ratio is just 0.23%, less than half the category average and well below PFF's 0.45%. Sector exposure skews heavily toward financial institutions (about 71%), with utilities and a smaller industrial component rounding out the portfolio. Leading holdings include preferred securities from Boeing, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Oracle, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, KKR, NextEra Energy, Microchip Technology, Southern Company, and Bank of America. PFFD focuses on fixed-rate, U.S. dollar-denominated preferreds, offering a purer, lower-cost expression of the preferred-income asset class.

Sector and Market Context

Preferred securities occupy a unique middle ground in the capital structure, sitting above common equity but below senior debt. Their returns are driven primarily by two forces: the creditworthiness of the issuing banks, utilities, and industrial companies, and the direction of interest rates. Because many preferreds carry long-duration, fixed-rate coupons, their prices tend to decline when yields rise and recover when rate expectations soften. Financial institutions dominate issuance, which explains the heavy financials weighting in both funds. Bank capital regulation — including requirements around CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) and additional Tier 1 capital — keeps banks active issuers of preferred shares. Meanwhile, the growing presence of convertible and hybrid preferreds from technology and industrial names has broadened the opportunity set. Preferred ETFs have also attracted steady income-seeking capital flows as investors look beyond traditional bonds for yield, though rate volatility and issuer-specific credit risk remain the principal headwinds.

How the Two Funds Stack Up

Over recent market cycles, PFF and PFFD have moved in close tandem, reflecting their shared sensitivity to interest rates and financial-sector credit. Their relative positioning, however, has differed at the margins. PFFD's lower fee burden and higher financials concentration have allowed it to capture more of the income stream during stable rate environments, while PFF's broader holdings and hybrid exposure have provided slightly more diversification during periods of sector rotation. Both funds have been pressured in recent years as the Federal Reserve's rate trajectory reshaped yield expectations, and both have benefited from subsequent stabilization in credit spreads. Performance differences have been modest, but the compounding effect of PFFD's roughly 22-basis-point cost advantage becomes more meaningful over multi-year holding periods. Neither fund offers meaningful protection against a sharp rise in rates, and both carry concentrated exposure to financial issuers, underscoring the importance of relative positioning rather than chasing short-term momentum. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings compare across similar income strategies.

How I Incorporate Tickeron’s AI Tools

In my ongoing research on income-focused ETFs, I frequently turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter and compare funds like these based on expense ratios, sector exposure, and performance metrics. It helps surface structural differences that might otherwise require manual digging through prospectuses, allowing me to focus on the factors most likely to influence long-term results for investors seeking steady yield.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Notable companies

Industry description

Market Cap

High and low price notable news

Volume