Primis Financial Corp., the McLean, Virginia-based holding company for Primis Bank, has rebuilt its earnings momentum after a challenging 2024, driven by a diversified mix of community banking, mortgage, mortgage warehouse lending, and the Panacea Financial division. The upcoming report matters because it tests whether that recovery can continue across multiple business lines at once. With the company planning a conversion of its entire bank to a digital, real-time core system beginning in the fourth quarter of 2026—a move management expects to unlock about $6.1 million in earnings enhancements—the third quarter serves as an important benchmark for the operating trends investors will watch next. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2026, Wall Street's consensus estimate for Primis Financial (FRST) stands at roughly $0.42 to $0.45 in earnings per share (EPS), depending on the source, compared with $0.28 in the third quarter of 2025. That implies a year-over-year earnings increase of roughly 50% to 60%. Revenue is expected to land near $50.9 million, up about 24% from the $41.05 million reported a year earlier.
These headline figures mask a history of uneven surprises. In the most recent quarter (Q2 2026), Primis reported EPS of $0.23 against a $0.38 consensus estimate, a miss of nearly 44%, even as revenue of $55.79 million came in above the $48.77 million analysts projected. Over the past four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates only once, according to Zacks, so investors are weighing solid growth trends against a mixed track record on the bottom line.
Beyond EPS and revenue, analysts are watching the net interest margin (NIM), which measures the spread between what a bank earns on loans and what it pays on deposits. The NIM held near 3.5% in the second quarter, while the cost of deposits in the core bank fell to 1.60% from 1.79% a year earlier—trends that will shape profitability this quarter.
Sentiment heading into the report is cautiously optimistic but mixed. Primis Financial shares have risen sharply over the trailing year, and the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #4, a rating that suggests near-term underperformance relative to the broader market. Analyst coverage remains limited, with a consensus "Moderate Buy" based on two analysts, and at least one firm has set a $19.00 price target.
The stock has historically shown meaningful post-earnings moves, with an average single-day reaction of roughly 4% and an implied move near 7% ahead of this release. Key risk factors include deposit-cost pressure, commercial real estate (CRE) exposure—investor CRE represents about 23% of total loans—and the potential for one-time items to swing headline EPS, as seen in recent quarters. Investors will be watching whether clean, recurring earnings can support the stock's elevated valuation.
Following the report, attention will shift quickly to the company's growth initiatives and their timing. Management has said it expects $6.1 million in earnings enhancements from converting the entire bank to a digital, real-time core system, with benefits beginning incrementally in the fourth quarter of 2026. Confirmation of that timeline—and any updated commentary on the associated costs—will be a key signal for investors.
Lending momentum also remains central to the story. The mortgage warehouse segment grew outstanding balances to $544 million at the end of the second quarter, up 195% year over year, while Panacea Financial reached $617 million in total loans. The core bank's loan pipeline stood at $158 million, up 28% from the prior quarter, suggesting continued origination activity into the current period.
Finally, investors should monitor asset quality and funding costs. The second quarter brought a 37% decline in nonperforming assets and a lower cost of deposits, but the company also took a provision on a larger office CRE loan. Whether credit trends remain stable and deposit costs continue to ease will be important inputs for the net interest margin and overall profitability in the quarters ahead.
As part of my regular analysis of earnings events like this one, I rely on Tickeron's AI Screener to quickly filter opportunities across sectors and identify comparable names with similar patterns or fundamentals. It helps streamline what would otherwise be a manual process, letting me focus on the specific metrics that matter most for names like Primis Financial.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FRST turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where FRST's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FRST as a result. In 44 of 87 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 51%.
Following a +1.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FRST advanced for three days, in 160 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
FRST moved below its 50-day moving average on September 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FRST crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FRST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
FRST broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FRST entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 24 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.891) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (7.213) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.140) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.026) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.270) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FRST’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FRST’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a regional bank
Industry RegionalBanks