GET DAILY SIGNALSQQEW vs QQQE: Equal-Weighted Alternatives to the Nasdaq-100
Key Takeaways
- Both funds use equal weighting to dilute the mega-cap concentration of the market-cap-weighted Nasdaq-100, but they apply the concept differently.
- QQEW holds about 50 names screened for quality and growth, while QQQE holds roughly 100 names across the full Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index.
- QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% versus QQEW's 0.55%, and it spreads exposure more evenly across sectors.
- QQEW carries a heavier technology tilt — often 60% or more — making it more sensitive to semiconductor and software earnings cycles.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: QQQE is the favored ticker, based on cost efficiency, broader diversification, and more balanced relative positioning.
Why These Two ETFs Draw Comparison
QQEW and QQQE are frequently compared because they sit in the same niche: both are equal-weighted alternatives to the flagship market-cap-weighted Nasdaq-100 product, QQQ. That common purpose makes them direct competitors for investors seeking to reduce concentration in a handful of mega-cap names. However, the two funds now diverge in a meaningful way. QQEW recently adopted a "select" quality-and-growth screen that trims the portfolio to roughly 50 holdings, while QQQE retains the broader, full equal-weighted Nasdaq-100 universe. This ETF comparison examines how those structural choices shape sector exposure, cost, and fund performance.
QQEW: First Trust's Quality-and-Growth Screen
QQEW is a passively managed, rules-based fund from First Trust Advisors that seeks to track the Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight Index. The index starts with the 100 non-financial companies in the Nasdaq-100, scores each on a "Blended Quality and Growth" metric — combining factors such as three-year revenue growth, forward earnings estimate growth, free cash flow growth, return on equity (a profitability measure), and profit margin — and then selects the top 50 names, weighted equally. The fund typically holds around 50 securities and is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly. Its portfolio is concentrated in technology, which has recently ranged from roughly 58% to 70% of assets, with healthcare and consumer discretionary among the next-largest sleeves. Representative top holdings have included META, AMD, MRVL, AAPL, and MSFT. The fund charges a 0.55% expense ratio and has gathered assets in the multi-billion-dollar range since its 2006 launch, though its current strategy dates to a late-2025 index change. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
QQQE: Direxion's Broader Equal-Weighted Approach
QQQE is a passively managed fund from Direxion that tracks the Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, the equal-weighted version of the broader Nasdaq-100. Instead of a quality screen, it assigns each of the approximately 100 constituent companies an equal weight of about 1%, using full replication of the underlying index. The fund holds roughly 100 to 104 securities and is typically rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually. Its sector mix is more balanced than QQEW's: technology has generally represented about 39% to 42% of the portfolio, with industrials, consumer discretionary, healthcare, and communication services each in the low-double-digit to high-single-digit range. Top holdings, each near 1% of assets, have included MU, Applied Materials, PANW, Paychex, and PACCAR. QQQE carries a 0.35% expense ratio and, since its 2012 inception, has built a multi-billion-dollar asset base.
Market Backdrop for Nasdaq-100 Equal Weight Strategies
Both ETFs are anchored to the Nasdaq-100, so their fortunes are tightly linked to the large-cap growth and technology complex. Recent market cycles have been shaped by the artificial-intelligence investment boom, semiconductor supply and demand dynamics, cloud-computing spending, and investor sensitivity to interest-rate expectations, which directly influence the valuations of long-duration growth companies. Equal-weight strategies tend to underperform concentrated mega-cap benchmarks during narrow, mega-cap-led rallies and to hold up better when breadth broadens across smaller Nasdaq-100 constituents. Regulatory scrutiny of large technology platforms and shifts in capital flows between growth and value styles are additional variables affecting relative positioning across both funds.
Performance and Positioning: Key Differences
Because both funds equal-weight Nasdaq-100 members, their broad directional behavior has tracked similar market themes in recent months. The key differentiator is concentration. QQEW's quality-and-growth filter has pushed technology to a dominant share of the portfolio, which can amplify both upside during semiconductor and software strength and drawdowns when the sector rotates lower. QQQE's roughly 100-name, more balanced portfolio generally offers lower single-name and single-sector risk. In recent market cycles, QQEW has tended to display a somewhat higher beta and volatility profile than QQQE, reflecting its heavier growth-factor and technology exposure. On cost, QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio gives it a structural edge that compounds over time. From what I see, this cost difference becomes more meaningful over longer holding periods.
Exploring ETF Opportunities with AI
In my own analysis, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to filter ETFs and compare sector exposures or holdings efficiently. It surfaces relevant data on technical patterns and fundamentals that complement traditional research. The tool has proven useful for quickly assessing how these two funds align with broader market opportunities.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Weighing the observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor QQQE. Its 0.35% expense ratio undercuts QQEW's 0.55%, and its roughly 100 equal-weighted holdings offer meaningfully broader diversification and lower single-stock concentration than QQEW's 50-name, quality-screened portfolio. QQQE's more balanced sector exposure reduces the portfolio's dependence on any single segment, which can improve risk-adjusted consistency across market cycles. While QQEW's quality-and-growth tilt may deliver stronger momentum when technology leadership is intact, its heavier sector concentration and higher cost introduce additional variability. On the combined basis of cost efficiency, diversification profile, and trend consistency, QQQE presents the more balanced probabilistic edge in the current environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
QQEW's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for QQEW moved out of oversold territory on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 25 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 25 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 51 of 57 cases where QQEW's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QQEW just turned positive on November 13, 2026. Looking at past instances where QQEW's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +4.40% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QQEW advanced for three days, in 275 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
QQEW may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QQEW as a result. In 62 of 82 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
QQEW moved below its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for QQEW crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 16 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QQEW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for QQEW entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
Advertisement