Go to the list of all blogs
Harry Richardson's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 16, 2020
Target and Walmart Head in to Earnings Reports Undervalued

Target and Walmart Head in to Earnings Reports Undervalued

I have written about the retail sector on several occasions over the last six months. I have made observations about how companies with stand-alone stores have performed better than companies where the majority of stores are in shopping centers. I have also pointed out how the companies that had an online presence before the pandemic have fared better. Two companies that fit both of those criteria are Target (TGT) and Walmart (WMT).

Both companies are set to report earnings this week with Walmart reporting on Tuesday and Target reporting on Wednesday. Analysts expect both companies to see earnings growth, but Target’s earnings are expected to grow more. In the third quarter of 2019 Target earned $1.36 per share and the consensus estimate for Q3 2020 is EPS of $1.60. That would mark an increase of 17.6%. Revenue is expected to grow by 12.1% for the quarter.

Walmart’s earnings are expected to come in at $1.18 for Q3 after coming in at $1.16 in the third quarter of last year. Revenue is expected to come in 3.3% higher.

If we look at Tickeron’s screener, both companies are pretty highly rated. Walmart is rated as a “strong buy” and Target is rated as a “buy”. On the fundamental side, Walmart has three positive signals and one negative signal while Target has two positive signals and no negative signals. The two areas where both stocks score well are in the Valuation Rating and the Profit vs. Risk Rating. Both stocks are considered undervalued at this time and both of the Profit vs. Risk Ratings are below 10 and that puts them in the top 10th percentile.

On the technical side, Target has six bullish signals and not a single bearish signal. Walmart has three bullish signals and no bearish signals.

Looking at the sentiment indicators for each stock, Target has a little more skepticism directed at it than Walmart does. There are 28 analysts following Target with 18 “buy” ratings, eight “hold” ratings, and two “sell” ratings. That gives us a buy percentage of 64.3% and that is slightly below average.

Walmart has 34 analysts following it with 26 “buy” ratings, six “hold” ratings, and two “sell” ratings. That gives us a buy percentage of 76.5% and that is slightly higher than average.

The short interest ratios for both companies are below average with Target’s at 2.4 and Walmart’s at 1.5. The average short interest ratio falls in the 3.0 range. What the buy percentages and the short interest ratios suggest is that there is slightly more optimism on Walmart ahead of the earnings reports. The optimism isn’t at an excessive level, but it could mean that expectations for the company are a little higher than they are for Target. If expectations are too high and can be difficult for the company to post numbers good enough to drive the stock higher.

The comprehensive head-to-head comparison shows how the two companies stack up against one another.


Contributor

Harry Richardson — Algorithmic Trader & Strategy Developer Harry is an algorithmic trader specializing in impulse and breakout trading strategies across cryptocurrency and equity markets. With more than 10 years of experience in developing automated trading systems, he focuses on building structured algorithms designed to capture momentum while maintaining strict risk control. His approach combines quantitative analysis, real-market execution, and continuous performance monitoring. Vitalii prioritizes risk management, drawdown control, and strategy stability over short-term optimization, ensuring algorithms are adaptable to changing market conditions. He has developed and tested hundreds of automated strategies, working extensively with live trading environments, forward testing, and portfolio-level algorithm management. His work centers on transforming trading ideas into fully operational, scalable automated systems.


1-on-1 3
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZ dropped sharply, sliding from a $16.72 prior close to $13.48 (-19.38%), with the decline beginning in premarket and deepening into the early regular session. No verified company-specific news or fundamental catalyst was issued; the fall tracked a broad China ADR selloff (the Nasdaq Golden Dragon index slid more than 2%), but that alone is too small to explain a ~20% drop — the stock's Hong Kong listing fell only -2.6%.
Nebius Group N.V. is expected to report third-quarter 2026 results in early November, following a second quarter in which revenue surged 454% year over year. Wall Street consensus tracked by Benzinga points to roughly $937 million in Q3 2026 revenue, up from $146.1 million in the year-ago quarter.
The $1.14 central target is not an analyst consensus; it is the all-cash merger consideration in GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) 's pending deal with Starman Optical, agreed in September 2026. With the stock trading near $0.88, reaching $1.14 would require a move of roughly 29.5%.
AtlasClear Holdings (ATCH) shares fell roughly 25.5% over the last 30 days, declining from $0.1881 on October 2 to $0.1401 on October 30. The pullback extended a longer downtrend that has kept the stock trading well below the $1.00 NYSE American minimum, keeping continued listing-compliance risk in focus.
NVDA fell -2.10% to $216.66 during regular trading, down from a prior close of $221.30. Primary catalyst: hotter-than-expected September CPI data reignited Fed rate-hike fears, raising borrowing costs for AI infrastructure buildouts.