Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) stands as one of the more recognizable names in the American confectionery space. Based in Chicago, the company produces and distributes a range of candy and gum items that have appeared on retail shelves for many years. Although the original Tootsie Roll remains central, the business has grown into a diversified portfolio through careful acquisitions over time. Investors often track TR for its combination of established brands, a measured financial approach, and a long history of returning capital to shareholders.
The roots of Tootsie Roll Industries go back to 1896, when Leo Hirschfeld created the original Tootsie Roll in New York City and named it after his daughter. The individually wrapped treat quickly became popular for its shelf life and appeal as an affordable option. The company later incorporated and shifted operations to Chicago in 1917.
In 1966, Melvin J. Gordon and Ellen Gordon took control and renamed the firm Tootsie Roll Industries. Under continued family direction, it expanded through acquisitions of established candy lines, evolving from a single-product operation into a broader confectionery player. Ellen Gordon has led as Chairman and CEO since 2015.
Tootsie Roll Industries focuses on manufacturing and distributing confectionery items at scale. Revenue comes mainly from sales to wholesale distributors, supermarkets, dollar stores, drug chains, mass merchandisers, warehouse clubs, vending operators, e-commerce sellers, and the U.S. military, among others. The portfolio covers chewy candies, lollipops, fruit chews, mints, chocolates, and bubble gum, helping the company serve everyday value-oriented demand across multiple formats.
The company operates in a competitive packaged foods environment alongside larger global participants. Its strengths include well-known brands, an established distribution network, and a conservative balance sheet that has supported acquisitions with limited debt. The United States accounts for the majority of sales, with additional activity in Canada, Mexico, and other regions. Manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and Mexico help support both domestic and export needs.
Several elements draw attention to TR. Its long-standing brands support steady, if modest, demand. The financial profile remains conservative, with low long-term debt, solid cash holdings, and uninterrupted cash dividends since 1945. The firm also issues a modest annual stock dividend. Growth has historically come from brand strength and selective acquisitions, though the mature confectionery sector has kept overall revenue expansion limited. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to review broader sector patterns.
Competition from larger food manufacturers remains intense. Rising costs for ingredients like sugar and cocoa, plus labor and packaging expenses, can affect margins. Shifts toward premium or health-focused snacks present ongoing challenges. As a family-controlled entity, the company features concentrated ownership and less public guidance than many peers, which limits outside shareholder influence and adds a layer of complexity for some investors. From what I see, these governance aspects warrant close attention alongside broader economic factors.
When analyzing companies in this space, I sometimes turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare metrics across similar names and refine my view of relative positioning.
Tootsie Roll Industries represents one of the remaining independent, family-led confectionery businesses of notable size in the U.S. Its century-spanning brands, prudent financial stance, and consistent dividend history since 1945 give it a distinct profile in consumer staples. While the mature industry and ownership structure introduce certain constraints, TR continues to hold relevance for those focused on durable brands and established capital-return practices.
In my own research process, Tickeron’s AI Screener has proven useful for quickly filtering stocks and ETFs by technical indicators, fundamentals, and industry patterns. It allows me to test ideas against customizable criteria without spending excessive time on manual reviews, which helps keep my analysis efficient when looking at names like TR or other sectors.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
TR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 27 of 39 cases where TR's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TR's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 17 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TR as a result. In 52 of 93 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TR just turned positive on November 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where TR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
TR moved above its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for TR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 10, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +4.54% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TR advanced for three days, in 201 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 79, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. TR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.076) is normal, around the industry mean (1.490). TR has a moderately high P/E Ratio (30.683) as compared to the industry average of (15.433). TR's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.680) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.364). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.163) among similar stocks. TR's P/S Ratio (3.883) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.937).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of confectionery products
Industry FoodSpecialtyCandy