GET DAILY SIGNALSVONV vs VTV: Comparing Vanguard's Two Large-Cap Value ETFs
Key Takeaways
- Both VONV and VTV are passively managed, large-cap U.S. value ETFs from Vanguard, but they track different benchmarks: the Russell 1000 Value Index versus the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index.
- VONV offers broader coverage with roughly 850 or more holdings, while VTV concentrates on about 330 of the largest, most liquid value names.
- VTV is the lower-cost vehicle (a 0.03% expense ratio versus 0.07% for VONV) and carries a larger asset base and higher dividend yield.
- Sector tilts differ modestly: both funds lean heavily on financials, but VONV has recently carried greater mega-cap technology exposure as index methodology has shifted.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: VTV — its lower cost, deeper liquidity, and more consistent large-cap value tilt give it the edge for core value exposure.
Introduction
When investors look for large-cap value exposure, two Vanguard funds often stand out: the Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Both are passively managed, full-replication vehicles aimed at U.S. large-cap value stocks, which puts them in direct competition for the same portfolio slot. Still, their underlying benchmarks, number of holdings, expense structures, and sector exposures show clear differences. I find that focusing on these structural details, rather than short-term price fluctuations, helps determine which one aligns better with a given strategy. This comparison walks through their profiles and current context to see where an AI-driven approach points today.
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) Overview
VONV aims to replicate the Russell 1000 Value Index, which covers the large- and mid-cap value portion of the Russell 1000 using metrics like price-to-book ratios and expected growth. The fund follows a passive, full-replication approach and stays nearly fully invested to keep tracking error minimal. It generally holds more than 850 stocks, providing broad exposure across the value space. Top positions have long included names such as Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, ExxonMobil, Johnson & Johnson, and Walmart. Recent index adjustments have brought in some mega-cap technology stocks like Amazon and Apple, which has slightly altered the fund’s profile. Sector weights lean toward financials at around 20% or higher, along with industrials, health care, and consumer discretionary, while technology and energy play smaller roles. The expense ratio sits at 0.07%, and the fund launched in 2010. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings stack up against peers.
Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) Overview
VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, which selects and weights large-cap U.S. companies based on multiple value factors. It also uses a passive, full-replication method but maintains a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 330 stocks focused on the largest and most liquid value names. Its largest holdings overlap significantly with VONV, featuring Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, ExxonMobil, Johnson & Johnson, and Walmart, plus additions like Chevron, AbbVie, Procter & Gamble, and Micron Technology. Financials make up about 23% of assets, followed by health care, technology, industrials, consumer staples, and energy. The 0.03% expense ratio ranks among the lowest in the category, and assets under management exceed $180 billion, making it one of the largest and most cost-effective options for large-cap value exposure. The fund has been around since 2004 and offers a yield of roughly 1.9%.
Industry and Thematic Backdrop
Both ETFs sit in the large-cap value style box, a segment that has seen renewed interest as investors shifted from high-valuation growth and artificial-intelligence names toward more reasonably priced, cash-flow-oriented businesses. Financials, the biggest sector in each fund, have gained support from a steeper yield curve and steady credit conditions, while energy holdings have moved with commodity prices. Key influences include evolving interest-rate expectations and earnings trends in banks, insurers, and industrials. The main downside risk remains a strong rebound in mega-cap growth stocks that could leave value-oriented holdings behind. Regulatory changes in banking and energy also affect relative sector positioning.
Performance and Positioning Comparison
Over recent weeks and months, the two funds have posted broadly comparable total returns given their shared large-cap value focus, though their positioning sets them apart. VONV’s wider holdings and recent addition of mega-cap technology names have made it a bit more responsive to tech-driven moves and less purely value-oriented. VTV, on the other hand, keeps a tighter, lower-beta profile with heavier financials and health care weights plus a higher dividend yield. Its more concentrated large-cap makeup has shown slightly more defensive traits during market dips, while VONV’s broader reach introduces a mild mid-cap element. Cost and scale considerations give VTV the advantage in longer-term, fee-sensitive evaluations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Looking at measurable factors instead of isolated price action, Tickeron’s AI framework currently points toward VTV. Its 0.03% expense ratio is less than half of VONV’s, creating a cost edge that adds up over time. The much larger AUM and stronger liquidity translate into tighter spreads and smoother trading. The concentrated large-cap makeup delivers a cleaner, steadier value exposure with a higher yield and generally lower volatility, whereas VONV’s broader reach and growing technology overlap soften its value character. Overall, the mix of lower costs, greater scale, solid diversification within value, and defensive qualities makes VTV the stronger choice for core value allocation.
Enhancing ETF Research with Tickeron Tools
In my own analysis process, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly compare holdings, sector weights, and performance metrics across similar ETFs. The platform’s ability to filter by fundamentals, technical patterns, and AI signals helps surface nuances that might otherwise take hours to uncover manually. It has become a regular part of how I evaluate value-oriented vehicles like these two Vanguard funds before making allocation decisions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
VTV in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on September 30, 2026
VTV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 33 of 36 cases where VTV's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on VTV as a result. In 72 of 87 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for VTV just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where VTV's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 56 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
VTV moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for VTV crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
Following a +1.18% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VTV advanced for three days, in 290 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 278 of 351 cases where VTV Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 79%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for VTV moved out of overbought territory on October 30, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 34 of the 52 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 16 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category LargeValue
Advertisement