Gerdau S.A. (GGB), the largest producer of long steel in the Americas and a leading Brazilian steelmaker, is trading sharply lower on Monday, down 7.25% to roughly $4.73 versus Friday's close of $5.10. The decline reflects a broad repricing of Brazilian assets following Sunday's presidential election, in which incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva secured a fourth term by defeating Senator Flávio Bolsonaro. Because financial markets had spent recent weeks positioning for a change in government and a more market-friendly fiscal agenda, Lula's victory triggered an immediate unwind of that "election trade," dragging Brazilian ADRs and the broader equity complex lower.
The dominant driver behind Monday's move is political, not company-specific. After the first round of voting on October 4, when Bolsonaro finished ahead, investors aggressively bought Brazilian equities on expectations of a pro-reform, fiscal-discipline administration. The Ibovespa surged past record levels, and the Brazilian real strengthened below R$5 to the dollar. Lula's second-round comeback reversed that narrative overnight. With a fourth term confirmed, investors now confront the prospect of continued fiscal deficits, elevated public spending, and a higher-for-longer interest-rate environment — all of which pressure Brazilian risk assets.
The repricing has been severe. The EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF fell more than 20% in early trading, while ADRs of Brazilian banks such as Itaú and Bradesco dropped by roughly 25% to 30%. GGB's 7.25% decline, while still significant, is comparatively contained.
One reason GGB is holding up better than Brazil's financial and consumer names is its dollar-based revenue profile. Gerdau generates a substantial share of its sales from North American operations and international exports. As the Brazilian real weakened sharply — the dollar jumped roughly 9% toward R$5.42 — the company's dollar-denominated earnings become more valuable in local-currency terms, partially offsetting the broader risk-off pressure. Mining peer VALE and aerospace exporter Embraer similarly logged smaller losses than banks and state-linked companies, underscoring the currency cushion for export-focused businesses.
The election shock compounds an already cautious environment for steelmakers. Iron ore prices have been trading near multi-year lows on weak Chinese demand, abundant supply, and pressure on Chinese steel mill margins. The World Steel Association recently trimmed its global demand outlook, while sell-side analysts have issued a series of downgrades on Brazilian steel names following a strong multi-month rally. These structural headwinds have kept sentiment fragile, leaving little buffer when the political shock arrived.
Trading volume in GGB has been elevated as the election outcome ripples through Brazilian assets, consistent with the heavy activity seen across the entire ADR complex. The move is clearly driven by country risk rather than any change in Gerdau's fundamentals: peers across Brazilian banking, energy, and materials are all trading lower in unison, while U.S. and other global equity markets are not experiencing the same degree of stress. Technically, the sell-off has pushed GGB back below recent short-term support levels, unwinding much of the gains built during the pre-election rally.
Investors will now look to Lula's early policy signals — particularly the makeup of his economic team and any commitments on the fiscal framework — as the key determinant of whether Brazilian assets stabilize or extend their losses. For GGB specifically, the focus turns to fundamentals: the company's third-quarter results are due shortly, with the market watching North American shipment resilience, Brazil operating margins, and the impact of maintenance costs at its Midlothian facility. Broader steel-sector dynamics, including iron ore pricing and global demand trends, will also shape the outlook. The primary risk remains a prolonged period of Brazilian fiscal uncertainty that keeps interest rates elevated and weighs on domestic demand, even as the company's export orientation provides some insulation.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots that are performing strongly under current market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each varying by strategy, timeframe, performance metrics, and traded symbols, but only the top performers are featured in this section. Traders looking to navigate volatile markets like today's Brazilian sell-off may find these tools a useful complement to their research. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
GGB moved above its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 37 of 44 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
Following a +4.38% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GGB advanced for three days, in 204 of 274 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
GGB may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 219 of 276 cases where GGB Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 79%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 71 cases where GGB's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GGB as a result. In 51 of 90 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GGB turned negative on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 26 of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 50%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GGB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.187) is normal, around the industry mean (2.170). P/E Ratio (4.435) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.879). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (0.339). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.057) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.729) is also within normal values, averaging (2.301).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GGB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of specialty steel products
Industry Steel