AAMI
Price
$44.46
Change
+$1.85 (+4.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
53 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$17.79
Change
-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.58B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAMI vs OWL

Header iconAAMI vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts AAMI vs OWLBanner chart's image
Acadian Asset Management
Price$44.46
Change+$1.85 (+4.34%)
Volume$954.97K
Capitalization1.59B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$17.79
Change-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Volume$16.05M
Capitalization11.58B
AAMI vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAMI vs. OWL commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAMI is a Hold and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AAMI: $44.46 vs. OWL: $17.79)
Brand notoriety: AAMI and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAMI: 321% vs. OWL: 226%
Market capitalization -- AAMI: $1.59B vs. OWL: $11.58B
AAMI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.59B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAMI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AAMI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAMI is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAMI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAMI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AAMI and OWL are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AAMI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -12.77% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AAMI is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($11.6B) has a higher market cap than AAMI($1.59B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than AAMI: OWL (161.73) vs AAMI (18.68). AAMI YTD gains are higher at: 68.917 vs. OWL (-21.179). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. AAMI (179M). OWL has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. AAMI (90.2M). AAMI has less debt than OWL: AAMI (358M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than AAMI: OWL (2.62B) vs AAMI (538M).
AAMIOWLAAMI / OWL
Capitalization1.59B11.6B14%
EBITDA179M804M22%
Gain YTD68.917-21.179-325%
P/E Ratio18.68161.7312%
Revenue538M2.62B21%
Total Cash90.2M118M76%
Total Debt358M3.65B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAMI: Fundamental Ratings
AAMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAMIOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USMIX22.090.15
+0.68%
Victory Extended Market Index
STPCX12.830.06
+0.47%
Saratoga Technology & Comm C
VCIEX9.470.04
+0.42%
VALIC Company I International Eqs Idx
MUHLX72.340.27
+0.37%
Muhlenkamp
CBALX55.83-0.08
-0.14%
Columbia Balanced Inst

AAMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAMI has been loosely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAMI jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAMI
1D Price
Change %
AAMI100%
+4.34%
IVZ - AAMI
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
OWL - AAMI
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
CRBG - AAMI
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FHI - AAMI
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
STEP - AAMI
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-1.44%
ARES - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
KKR - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
APO - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
CG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TPG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More