ABBV
Price
$234.74
Change
+$4.73 (+2.06%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
414.77B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GRFS
Price
$7.19
Change
-$0.09 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.21B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABBV vs GRFS

ABBV vs GRFS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABBV vs. GRFS commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABBV is a Buy and GRFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ABBV: $230.01 vs. GRFS: $7.28)
Brand notoriety: ABBV: Notable vs. GRFS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABBV: 151% vs. GRFS: 102%
Market capitalization -- ABBV: $406.38B vs. GRFS: $6.29B
ABBV [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $406.38B. GRFS’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $6.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $982.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $182.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABBV’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGRFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABBV’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GRFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABBV is a better buy in the long-term than GRFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABBV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABBV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABBV is a better buy in the short-term than GRFS.

Price Growth

ABBV (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +3.80% price change this week, while GRFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABBV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

GRFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+3.19% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABBV($415B) has a higher market cap than GRFS($6.21B). ABBV has higher P/E ratio than GRFS: ABBV (112.75) vs GRFS (10.42). ABBV YTD gains are higher at: 2.317 vs. GRFS (-22.139). ABBV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.9B vs. GRFS (1.61B). ABBV has more cash in the bank: 9.39B vs. GRFS (758M). GRFS has less debt than ABBV: GRFS (9.67B) vs ABBV (72.9B). ABBV has higher revenues than GRFS: ABBV (62.8B) vs GRFS (7.44B).
ABBVGRFSABBV / GRFS
Capitalization415B6.21B6,678%
EBITDA16.9B1.61B1,051%
Gain YTD2.317-22.139-10%
P/E Ratio112.7510.421,082%
Revenue62.8B7.44B844%
Total Cash9.39B758M1,239%
Total Debt72.9B9.67B754%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABBV vs GRFS: Fundamental Ratings
ABBV
GRFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRFS's Valuation (7) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as ABBV (14). This means that GRFS’s stock grew similarly to ABBV’s over the last 12 months.

ABBV's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRFS (100). This means that ABBV’s stock grew significantly faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

ABBV's SMR Rating (1) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRFS (79). This means that ABBV’s stock grew significantly faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

ABBV's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GRFS (71). This means that ABBV’s stock grew similarly to GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

ABBV's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRFS (97). This means that ABBV’s stock grew significantly faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABBVGRFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABBV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTXN34.140.55
+1.65%
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
FLJH47.200.34
+0.73%
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
TBJL19.830.02
+0.13%
Innovator 20+ Year Tsy Bd Bfr ETF July
DVXB28.31N/A
N/A
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Vol ETF
QQQ737.95-1.86
-0.25%
Invesco QQQ Trust

ABBV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABBV has been loosely correlated with BMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABBV jumps, then BMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABBV
1D Price
Change %
ABBV100%
+6.25%
BMY - ABBV
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
NVS - ABBV
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
AMGN - ABBV
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
MRK - ABBV
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
JNJ - ABBV
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

GRFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRFS and NVS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRFS and NVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRFS
1D Price
Change %
GRFS100%
-1.62%
NVS - GRFS
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
ABBV - GRFS
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
GSK - GRFS
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
MRK - GRFS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
GILD - GRFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More