GRFS
Price
$7.47
Change
-$0.16 (-2.10%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.5B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVS
Price
$143.68
Change
+$0.20 (+0.14%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
275.73B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRFS vs NVS

Header iconGRFS vs NVS Comparison
Open Charts GRFS vs NVSBanner chart's image
GRFS vs NVS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRFS vs. NVS commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRFS is a Hold and NVS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GRFS: $7.63 vs. NVS: $143.48)
Brand notoriety: GRFS and NVS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRFS: 86% vs. NVS: 103%
Market capitalization -- GRFS: $6.5B vs. NVS: $275.73B
GRFS [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $6.5B. NVS’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $275.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $948.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $178.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GRFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVS is a better buy in the long-term than GRFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NVS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVS is a better buy in the short-term than GRFS.

Price Growth

GRFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -4.74% price change this week, while NVS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -4.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

NVS is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.86% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVS($276B) has a higher market cap than GRFS($6.5B). NVS has higher P/E ratio than GRFS: NVS (20.56) vs GRFS (10.75). NVS YTD gains are higher at: 7.214 vs. GRFS (-18.396). NVS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.4B vs. GRFS (1.63B). NVS has more cash in the bank: 6.98B vs. GRFS (825M). GRFS has less debt than NVS: GRFS (8.82B) vs NVS (47B). NVS has higher revenues than GRFS: NVS (56.6B) vs GRFS (7.52B).
GRFSNVSGRFS / NVS
Capitalization6.5B276B2%
EBITDA1.63B22.4B7%
Gain YTD-18.3967.214-255%
P/E Ratio10.7520.5652%
Revenue7.52B56.6B13%
Total Cash825M6.98B12%
Total Debt8.82B47B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRFS vs NVS: Fundamental Ratings
GRFS
NVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1008
SMR RATING
1..100
8127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NVS's Valuation (5) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GRFS (8). This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRFS (100). This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's SMR Rating (27) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRFS (81). This means that NVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as GRFS (72). This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

NVS's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRFS (97). This means that NVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRFSNVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIRD4.470.29
+6.94%
Allbirds Inc
ELVR88.41-0.17
-0.19%
Sayona Mining Limited
ARM402.71-6.14
-1.50%
Arm Holdings plc
IRD4.00-0.12
-2.91%
Opus Genetics Inc
MORN185.51-10.31
-5.27%
Morningstar

GRFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRFS and ABBV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRFS and ABBV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRFS
1D Price
Change %
GRFS100%
-1.42%
ABBV - GRFS
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
NVS - GRFS
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
GSK - GRFS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
PFE - GRFS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
MRK - GRFS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

NVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVS has been loosely correlated with GSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVS jumps, then GSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVS
1D Price
Change %
NVS100%
-1.51%
GSK - NVS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
AMGN - NVS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
BMY - NVS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
PFE - NVS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
SNY - NVS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More