Advertisement
ABBV vs NSRX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABBV is a Buy and NSRX is a StrongBuy.
| ABBV | NSRX | ABBV / NSRX | |
| Capitalization | 454B | 39.9M | 1,137,845% |
| EBITDA | 19.5B | -10.13M | -192,536% |
| Gain YTD | 15.191 | -62.788 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 72.63 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 64.4B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 6.57B | 11.8M | 55,669% |
| Total Debt | 70.8B | 103K | 68,737,864% |
ABBV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ABBV | NSRX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 19 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABBV’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green while NSRX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ABBV’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- NSRX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABBV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSRX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABBV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NSRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ABBV (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.26% price change this week, while NSRX (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -8.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABBV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
NSRX is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.36% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
Advertisement
ABBV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABBV has been loosely correlated with BMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABBV jumps, then BMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABBV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| BMY - ABBV | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| NVS - ABBV | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| JNJ - ABBV | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| MRK - ABBV | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| AMGN - ABBV | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||
NSRX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NSRX and MDCX have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSRX and MDCX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSRX | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| MDCX - NSRX | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| OGN - NSRX | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| ABBV - NSRX | -12% Poorly correlated | +0.83% |