ABCB
Price
$66.45
Change
+$0.68 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
11 days until earnings call
FSEA
Price
$11.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
42.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABCB vs FSEA

Header iconABCB vs FSEA Comparison
Open Charts ABCB vs FSEABanner chart's image
Ameris Ban
Price$66.45
Change+$0.68 (+1.03%)
Volume$265.42K
Capitalization3.34B
First Seacoast Ban
Price$11.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.87K
Capitalization42.93M
ABCB vs FSEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABCB vs. FSEA commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABCB is a StrongBuy and FSEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ABCB: $66.45 vs. FSEA: $11.26)
Brand notoriety: ABCB and FSEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABCB: 79% vs. FSEA: 14%
Market capitalization -- ABCB: $3.34B vs. FSEA: $42.93M
ABCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.34B. FSEA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABCB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the long-term than ABCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABCB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSEA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSEA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the short-term than ABCB.

Price Growth

ABCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while FSEA (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FSEA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABCB($3.34B) has a higher market cap than FSEA($42.9M). FSEA has higher P/E ratio than ABCB: FSEA (35.97) vs ABCB (12.17). FSEA YTD gains are higher at: 12.151 vs. ABCB (6.904). FSEA has less debt than ABCB: FSEA (44.9M) vs ABCB (640M). ABCB has higher revenues than FSEA: ABCB (1.04B) vs FSEA (13.6M).
ABCBFSEAABCB / FSEA
Capitalization3.34B42.9M7,786%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.90412.15157%
P/E Ratio12.1735.9734%
Revenue1.04B13.6M7,669%
Total Cash241MN/A-
Total Debt640M44.9M1,425%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABCB vs FSEA: Fundamental Ratings
ABCB
FSEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2223
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2644
SMR RATING
1..100
1187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6823
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSEA's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ABCB (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to ABCB’s over the last 12 months.

ABCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (44) in the null industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

ABCB's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSEA (87) in the null industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew significantly faster than FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

ABCB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (50) in the null industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABCB (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABCBFSEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SECIX45.74N/A
N/A
NAA Large Cap Value A
MNMRX14.66N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
GKIRX26.62N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Inv
BIRCX21.98N/A
N/A
BlackRock Sustainable Adg Lg Cp Cr C
JHEQX33.34N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity I

ABCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABCB has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ABCB jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABCB
1D Price
Change %
ABCB100%
+1.03%
HWC - ABCB
93%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
SBCF - ABCB
93%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
UCB - ABCB
93%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
UBSI - ABCB
93%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
TRMK - ABCB
92%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
+0.09%
HBNC - FSEA
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
BANR - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
HTB - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
ABCB - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
FRME - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More