Advertisement
ABCB vs FSEA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABCB is a Hold and FSEA is a Buy.
ABCB | FSEA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABCB's Valuation (79) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (89) in the null industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.
FSEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as ABCB (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to ABCB’s over the last 12 months.
ABCB's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSEA (89) in the null industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew significantly faster than FSEA’s over the last 12 months.
FSEA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ABCB (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to ABCB’s over the last 12 months.
FSEA's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as ABCB (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to ABCB’s over the last 12 months.
| ABCB | FSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 45% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABCB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while FSEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ABCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FSEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABCB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSEA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FSEA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ABCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.65% price change this week, while FSEA (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIVB | 65.37 | 0.86 | +1.33% |
| iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) | |||
| CWS | 67.07 | 0.54 | +0.82% |
| AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) | |||
| DOCT | 48.06 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October | |||
| IONZ | 20.17 | -0.15 | -0.74% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2x Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) | |||
| LITP | 8.90 | -0.31 | -3.37% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) | |||
FSEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSEA | 100% | N/A | ||
| HBNC - FSEA | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| BANR - FSEA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| HTB - FSEA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| ABCB - FSEA | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| FRME - FSEA | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||