FSEA
Price
$16.97
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
79.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBNC
Price
$20.45
Change
-$0.13 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSEA vs HBNC

FSEA vs HBNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSEA vs. HBNC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEA is a Buy and HBNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FSEA: $16.97 vs. HBNC: $20.45)
Brand notoriety: FSEA and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSEA: 18% vs. HBNC: 50%
Market capitalization -- FSEA: $79.62M vs. HBNC: $1.04B
FSEA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $79.62M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the long-term than HBNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSEA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSEA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBNC is a better buy in the short-term than FSEA.

Price Growth

FSEA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($1.05B) has a higher market cap than FSEA($79.6M). FSEA YTD gains are higher at: 28.561 vs. HBNC (23.876). FSEA has less debt than HBNC: FSEA (51.7M) vs HBNC (316M). FSEA has higher revenues than HBNC: FSEA (15.7M) vs HBNC (-27.12M).
FSEAHBNCFSEA / HBNC
Capitalization79.6M1.05B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.56123.876120%
P/E RatioN/A13.73-
Revenue15.7M-27.12M-58%
Total CashN/A68.4M-
Total Debt51.7M316M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSEA vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
FSEA
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3269
SMR RATING
1..100
9296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBNC's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSEA (87) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBNC (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew significantly faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSEAHBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLPAX41.430.31
+0.75%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras A
JBATX32.180.23
+0.72%
JHancock Balanced R2
PVCIX12.690.01
+0.08%
Palm Valley Capital Institutional
RYRRX69.71-0.35
-0.50%
Rydex Russell 2000 A
BCSVX21.63-0.22
-1.01%
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl Sm Co Inv

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
+0.06%
HBNC - FSEA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
BANR - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
HTB - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
ABCB - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
FRME - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
More