ABLV
Price
$0.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
40.99M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLWS
Price
$3.90
Change
+$0.06 (+1.56%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
249.98M
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABLV vs FLWS

ABLV vs FLWS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABLV vs. FLWS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABLV is a Hold and FLWS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ABLV: $0.83 vs. FLWS: $3.90)
Brand notoriety: ABLV: Not notable vs. FLWS: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABLV: 14% vs. FLWS: 35%
Market capitalization -- ABLV: $40.99M vs. FLWS: $249.98M
ABLV [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $40.99M. FLWS’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $249.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABLV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABLV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ABLV and FLWS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABLV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLWS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABLV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABLV is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

ABLV (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -12.63% price change this week, while FLWS (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.78% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLWS($250M) has a higher market cap than ABLV($41M). ABLV YTD gains are higher at: 22.872 vs. FLWS (-0.763).
ABLVFLWSABLV / FLWS
Capitalization41M250M16%
EBITDAN/A-67.75M-
Gain YTD22.872-0.763-2,996%
P/E Ratio2.79N/A-
RevenueN/A1.55B-
Total CashN/A50.7M-
Total DebtN/A252M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABLVFLWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAITX59.390.59
+1.00%
Hartford Core Equity R6
BLDIX9.580.05
+0.51%
BlackRock Managed Income Institutional
HSMYX15.93-0.01
-0.06%
Hartford Small Cap Value Y
PGRTX18.11-0.05
-0.28%
Principal SmallCap Growth I Instl
GMJPX10.02-0.07
-0.69%
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities P

ABLV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABLV and MCHX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABLV and MCHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABLV
1D Price
Change %
ABLV100%
N/A
MCHX - ABLV
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
EYE - ABLV
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
TZOO - ABLV
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
FLWS - ABLV
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
ZD - ABLV
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+1.56%
RUSHA - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
HVT - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
LOW - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
CPRT - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
FND - FLWS
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.10%
More