This comparison examines ABM and MSA to highlight differences in business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning. Both companies operate in the industrials space but serve distinct end markets, making the pairing relevant for investors seeking exposure to facility services versus safety equipment. Traders and portfolio managers evaluating relative value, sector rotation opportunities, or defensive characteristics in uncertain economic conditions may find the analysis useful for assessing trade-offs in growth, stability, and capital allocation.
ABM Industries Incorporated provides integrated facility solutions, including janitorial, engineering, parking, and energy services across commercial, industrial, and institutional clients. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range following fiscal first-quarter results that showed revenue of $2.2 billion, representing 6.1% year-over-year growth including 5.5% organic expansion. Adjusted earnings per share came in slightly below consensus estimates. Sentiment has remained measured ahead of the fiscal second-quarter earnings release scheduled for early June, with investors monitoring margin trends and organic growth sustainability amid broader economic conditions.
MSA Safety Incorporated develops and manufactures safety products such as self-contained breathing apparatus, gas detection systems, fall protection equipment, and firefighter gear for industrial, fire service, and military applications. Recent market activity reflected positive momentum after first-quarter results delivered revenue of $463.6 million, up 10% year-over-year with a beat on both top- and bottom-line expectations. Adjusted earnings per share reached $1.99, supported by margin expansion and strong free cash flow. The company also raised its quarterly dividend for the 56th consecutive year and authorized a new $500 million share repurchase program, contributing to constructive investor sentiment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform’s AI trading bots that have demonstrated strong alignment with prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers, yet only those with the most suitable strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of approaches, including varying win rates, profit factors, drawdown profiles, and holding periods across equities and other instruments. The section provides transparent performance data and statistics to help users evaluate options. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current selections and detailed metrics.
ABM Industries operates a service-oriented business model centered on recurring facility maintenance contracts, which tends to generate more predictable revenue streams but can face pressure from labor costs and contract renewals. MSA Safety’s product-based model benefits from demand for safety equipment driven by regulatory requirements and workplace safety initiatives, often supporting higher gross margins. In recent momentum, MSA Safety posted clearer earnings outperformance and capital return announcements, while ABM Industries showed steadier but less dynamic top-line growth. Risk factors include ABM Industries’ exposure to commercial real estate cycles and MSA Safety’s sensitivity to industrial spending patterns. Sector exposure places ABM Industries more squarely in commercial services, whereas MSA Safety aligns with industrial safety and personal protective equipment markets. Market sentiment in recent weeks has reflected greater near-term visibility for MSA Safety following its results and dividend action.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, margin trends, and capital allocation signals, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable relative positioning to MSA over ABM. MSA Safety’s demonstrated ability to exceed expectations, expand margins, and enhance shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks provides a constructive backdrop, though broader market conditions and upcoming data points for both companies warrant ongoing monitoring.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABM (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +7.97% price change this week, while MSA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.10%.
ABM is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2026.
MSA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.85% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| ABM | MSA | ABM / MSA | |
| Capitalization | 2.69B | 6.17B | 44% |
| EBITDA | 428M | 488M | 88% |
| Gain YTD | 10.123 | 0.416 | 2,436% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.67 | 21.58 | 82% |
| Revenue | 9.05B | 1.92B | 472% |
| Total Cash | 94.9M | 180M | 53% |
| Total Debt | 1.97B | 658M | 299% |
ABM | MSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABM's Valuation (9) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSA (91) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew significantly faster than MSA’s over the last 12 months.
MSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is in the same range as ABM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MSA’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.
MSA's SMR Rating (42) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABM (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.
ABM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as MSA (70) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to MSA’s over the last 12 months.
MSA's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ABM (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.
| ABM | MSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PYPG | 4.80 | 0.07 | +1.38% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | |||
| TTT | 68.24 | 0.62 | +0.91% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Trs | |||
| QDTE | 30.74 | 0.24 | +0.79% |
| Roundhill Innovt-100 0DTE CovCllStratETF | |||
| VIG | 235.73 | 1.25 | +0.53% |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | |||
| MMTM | 315.13 | 0.78 | +0.25% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500MomtTiltETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSA has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSA jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.