Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHMRX
ABTFX vs NHMRX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHMRX
ABTFX vs NHMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHMRX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMRX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. ABTFX (2.8B). NHMRX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHMRX (5.63) vs ABTFX (3.63). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHMRX: ABTFX (16 years) vs NHMRX (27 years). ABTFX (1.87) and NHMRX (1.80) have similar cost to investors . ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NHMRX (18.00). ABTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMRX: ABTFX (2500) vs NHMRX (100000). NHMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. ABTFX (6.48). NHMRX return over 5 years is better than : 1.69 vs. ABTFX (-3.85).
| ABTFX | NHMRX | ABTFX / NHMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.80 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.80 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.064 | 2.967 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.8B | 12.6B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 5.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 8.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.27 | 11.88 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.85 | 1.69 | -228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.85 | 25.80 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement