Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHMRX
ABTFX vs NHMRX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHMRX
ABTFX vs NHMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHMRX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMRX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. ABTFX (2.68B). NHMRX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHMRX (5.78) vs ABTFX (3.45). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHMRX: ABTFX (17 years) vs NHMRX (27 years). ABTFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than NHMRX (1.70). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NHMRX (15.00). ABTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMRX: ABTFX (2500) vs NHMRX (100000). NHMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.95 vs. ABTFX (-1.34). NHMRX return over 5 years is better than : -2.99 vs. ABTFX (-8.27).
| ABTFX | NHMRX | ABTFX / NHMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.70 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.70 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.964 | -0.930 | 319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 11.9B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 5.78 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 0.95 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.02 | 11.95 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.27 | -2.99 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.21 | 21.18 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement