Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWCX vs RLBGX
ABWCX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts ABWCX vs RLBGX
AB All Market Total Return C
Price$16.25
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.78M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.84
Change+$0.23 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
ABWCX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABWCX vs. RLBGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABWCX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. ABWCX (427M). ABWCX (2.12) and RLBGX (2.09) have matching dividends . ABWCX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: ABWCX (22 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). ABWCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). ABWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 182.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWCX: RLBGX (250) vs ABWCX (2500). RLBGX (10.35) and ABWCX (9.99) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.80 vs. ABWCX (14.89).
| ABWCX | RLBGX | ABWCX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.25 | 744% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.25 | 748% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.169 | 11.633 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 2.09 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 10.35 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.49 | 41.14 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.89 | 41.80 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.20 | 78.87 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement