ESE($7B) has a higher market cap than ACFN($54.8M). ESE has higher P/E ratio than ACFN: ESE (50.15) vs ACFN (35.43). ACFN YTD gains are higher at: 43.146 vs. ESE (38.466). ESE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 306M vs. ACFN (815K). ESE has more cash in the bank: 73.2M vs. ACFN (4.48M). ACFN has less debt than ESE: ACFN (959K) vs ESE (129M). ESE has higher revenues than ACFN: ESE (1.29B) vs ACFN (9.57M).

	ACFN	ESE	ACFN / ESE
Capitalization	54.8M	7B	1%
EBITDA	815K	306M	0%
Gain YTD	43.146	38.466	112%
P/E Ratio	35.43	50.15	71%
Revenue	9.57M	1.29B	1%
Total Cash	4.48M	73.2M	6%
Total Debt	959K	129M	1%

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

ACFN vs ESE: Fundamental Ratings

	ACFN	ESE
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100	50	73
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100	51 Fair valued	89 Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100	60	20
SMR RATING 1..100	47	45
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100	40	59
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100	4	37
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100	50	50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACFN's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESE (89) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that ACFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESE’s over the last 12 months.

ESE's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACFN (60) in the null industry. This means that ESE’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACFN’s over the last 12 months.

ESE's SMR Rating (45) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ACFN (47) in the null industry. This means that ESE’s stock grew similarly to ACFN’s over the last 12 months.

ACFN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ESE (59) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that ACFN’s stock grew similarly to ESE’s over the last 12 months.

ACFN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESE (37) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that ACFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	ACFN	ESE
RSI ODDS (%)	N/A	3 days ago 69%
Stochastic ODDS (%)	3 days ago 90%	3 days ago 71%
Momentum ODDS (%)	3 days ago 72%	3 days ago 46%
MACD ODDS (%)	3 days ago 60%	3 days ago 70%
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	3 days ago 68%	3 days ago 52%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	3 days ago 69%	3 days ago 48%
Advances ODDS (%)	3 days ago 71%	10 days ago 64%
Declines ODDS (%)	14 days ago 88%	4 days ago 51%
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	3 days ago 90%	N/A
Aroon ODDS (%)	3 days ago 63%	3 days ago 46%

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 13, 2026

Stock price -- (ACFN: $21.61 vs. ESE: $270.30)

Brand notoriety: ACFN and ESE are both not notable

Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACFN: 200% vs. ESE: 102%

Market capitalization -- ACFN: $54.79M vs. ESE: $7B

ACFN [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $54.79M. ESE’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $27.54K to $122.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while ESE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

ACFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
ESE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

According to our system of comparison, ACFN is a better buy in the long-term than ESE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

ACFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
ESE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, ACFN is a better buy in the short-term than ESE.

Price Growth

ACFN (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +13.58% price change this week, while ESE (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESE is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-2.92% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

View a ticker or compare two or three

ACFN

Daily Signal:

Gain/Loss:

ESE

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

Trend Trader, Long Only: Profitability Model for Russell 2000 Stocks, 60 min, (FA)Trend Trader, Long Only: Profitability Model for Russell 2000 Stocks, 60 min, (FA)

VIEW DETAILS VIEW DETAILS

VIEW FOR FREE VIEW FOR FREE

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
SCSAX	18.93	0.20	+1.07%
Allspring Common Stock A
ASERX	120.38	1.03	+0.86%
American Century Select R
INIVX	30.94	0.26	+0.85%
VanEck International Investors Gold A
ACFFX	30.97	0.22	+0.72%
Columbia Acorn International Sel Inst
RYAKX	78.12	0.50	+0.64%
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy A

ACFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACFN and NOVT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACFN and NOVT's prices will move in lockstep.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To ACFN	1D Price Change %
ACFN	100%	+3.08%
NOVT - ACFN	27% Poorly correlated	+1.84%
ARBE - ACFN	20% Poorly correlated	+3.27%
MVIS - ACFN	20% Poorly correlated	+3.14%
ESE - ACFN	20% Poorly correlated	+1.14%
WRAP - ACFN	16% Poorly correlated	+3.70%
More

ESE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESE has been loosely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESE jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To ESE	1D Price Change %
ESE	100%	+1.14%
MKSI - ESE	52% Loosely correlated	+2.09%
KEYS - ESE	50% Loosely correlated	+3.99%
TDY - ESE	48% Loosely correlated	+1.22%
ST - ESE	43% Loosely correlated	+3.44%
COHR - ESE	39% Loosely correlated	+4.16%
More