Investors tracking the industrials and defense-technology space often encounter two compelling but structurally different names: ESCO Technologies and Teledyne Technologies. Both companies design and manufacture highly engineered products for aerospace, defense, and specialized industrial markets. Yet their scale, financial profiles, and growth strategies diverge in important ways. This stock comparison examines how ESE and TDY have performed recently, what forces are shaping their trajectories, and how AI-driven tools are helping traders navigate the relative positioning of these two stocks. Whether you are a long-term investor evaluating sector exposure or a tactical trader monitoring momentum shifts, understanding the contrast between these two companies can sharpen your market perspective.
ESCO Technologies Inc., headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a diversified manufacturer of engineered products and systems serving aerospace and defense, utility-grid, and RF (radio frequency) test and measurement markets. The company operates through three segments: Aerospace & Defense, which provides specialty filtration and naval products; Utility Solutions Group, offering diagnostic testing for electric power grids; and RF Test and Measurement, which designs electromagnetic and acoustic energy containment solutions.
In recent market activity, ESE has been one of the strongest performers in the industrials sector, with a one-year gain exceeding 70%. The stock has been supported by robust defense spending, particularly in naval programs, and by a transformative acquisition strategy. The company's acquisition of Signature Management & Power (now ESCO Maritime Solutions) expanded its footprint in ship propulsion, while the announced $2.35 billion purchase of Megger Group Limited signals a major push into utility testing and measurement. Revenue in recent quarters rose more than 30% year-over-year, and the company's backlog reached approximately $1.17 billion, with roughly two-thirds expected to convert within twelve months. Analysts have raised price targets, with consensus estimates pointing toward $385–$410. However, the stock's elevated trailing P/E ratio above 60 and a PEG (price/earnings-to-growth) ratio above 2.0 suggest the market has already priced in significant future growth.
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated, based in Thousand Oaks, California, is a multinational industrial technology company providing digital imaging sensors, instrumentation, aerospace and defense electronics, and engineered systems. Its products support applications ranging from deep-sea exploration and environmental monitoring to missile-tracking satellites and unmanned aerial systems. The company operates through four segments: Digital Imaging, Instrumentation, Aerospace and Defense Electronics, and Engineered Systems.
TDY has demonstrated consistent momentum, with a one-year return near 19% and a year-to-date gain of approximately 28%. The company reported record quarterly results in July 2026, with revenue reaching $1.66 billion — up 9.8% year-over-year — and non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings per share of $6.28, comfortably beating consensus estimates. Management raised full-year 2026 adjusted EPS (earnings per share) guidance to a range of $24.45–$24.65. Digital Imaging led segment growth with a 12.7% revenue increase, fueled by infrared detectors for space-based imaging and unmanned systems. Teledyne's funded backlog hit approximately $5 billion, and orders have exceeded sales for eleven consecutive quarters. With a trailing P/E near 31 and a beta of 0.92, TDY offers a relatively defensive profile within the technology-industrial space, though some analysts note that premium valuation may limit near-term upside after the recent rally.
For traders who prefer a data-driven approach to stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page provides a curated view of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that scan thousands of tickers across all market sectors, but only those demonstrating the strongest adaptability to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from 5-minute intraday strategies to longer-duration swing trading — and deliver a wide range of performance statistics. Some bots have posted annualized returns above 200%, win rates exceeding 65%, and profit factors above 4.0, indicating that for every dollar risked, more than four dollars were earned. Each bot has its own strategy, timeframe, and set of tickers it trades, allowing users to identify approaches aligned with their objectives. Explore the full selection of Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are capturing opportunity in today's market.
The most immediate contrast between ESE and TDY is scale. Teledyne's market capitalization of roughly $30 billion is nearly four times ESCO's approximately $8.5 billion. TDY also generates roughly five times the revenue and net income, giving it deeper resources for R&D (research and development) and acquisition-driven growth. Where TDY has pursued a "string of pearls" acquisition strategy — smaller, bolt-on deals that complement its existing portfolio — ESCO is pursuing more transformational M&A, as evidenced by the Megger announcement.
In terms of sector exposure, both companies benefit from defense tailwinds, but the composition differs. TDY's Digital Imaging segment (over 50% of sales) ties it closely to infrared sensing, unmanned systems, and space-based surveillance — areas experiencing strong secular demand. ESE's Aerospace & Defense segment (around 46% of sales) is anchored in filtration systems and naval components, giving it more concentrated exposure to specific military platforms and submarine programs.
On valuation, TDY's trailing P/E of roughly 31 appears more moderate than ESE's P/E above 64. However, this gap partly reflects ESE's faster projected earnings growth as recent acquisitions begin contributing. Risk profiles also differ: ESE faces substantial integration and leverage risk from the Megger transaction, while TDY must navigate the stabilization of short-cycle commercial businesses in industrial machine vision and test instrumentation. From a sentiment standpoint, both stocks enjoy "Buy" or "Moderate Buy" consensus ratings from Wall Street analysts, but TDY's lower beta (0.92 vs. 1.09) and larger institutional base provide a smoother ride during volatility.
Based on observable market patterns and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor TDY at the current juncture, though the preference is probabilistic rather than absolute. TDY's combination of a record $5 billion funded backlog, eleven consecutive quarters of orders exceeding sales, recently raised guidance, and broader segment diversification suggests a steadier trend trajectory with lower drawdown risk. ESE's momentum is undeniably stronger over the past year, but its elevated valuation multiples and impending execution demands from the Megger integration introduce greater outcome variability. For traders prioritizing trend consistency, lower volatility, and multi-quarter visibility, TDY presents a more balanced profile. For those willing to accept higher valuation risk in exchange for potentially faster earnings acceleration, ESE remains a catalyst-rich alternative — but one that may require closer monitoring as integration milestones approach.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESE (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -8.30% price change this week, while TDY (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -2.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.10%.
ESE is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
TDY is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| ESE | TDY | ESE / TDY | |
| Capitalization | 7.79B | 31.2B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 293M | 1.59B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | 54.095 | 31.901 | 170% |
| P/E Ratio | 55.81 | 32.59 | 171% |
| Revenue | 1.25B | 6.37B | 20% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 340M | - |
| Total Debt | 191M | 2.03B | 9% |
ESE | TDY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESE's Valuation (87) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TDY (94). This means that ESE’s stock grew similarly to TDY’s over the last 12 months.
ESE's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TDY (34). This means that ESE’s stock grew similarly to TDY’s over the last 12 months.
ESE's SMR Rating (44) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TDY (75). This means that ESE’s stock grew similarly to TDY’s over the last 12 months.
TDY's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ESE (49). This means that TDY’s stock grew similarly to ESE’s over the last 12 months.
ESE's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TDY (40). This means that ESE’s stock grew similarly to TDY’s over the last 12 months.
| ESE | TDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 8 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 3 days ago 52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESE has been loosely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESE jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESE | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| MKSI - ESE | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| KEYS - ESE | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TDY - ESE | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| COHR - ESE | 44% Loosely correlated | -7.99% | ||
| ST - ESE | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDY has been loosely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDY jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.