Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFSX vs RGAHX
ACFSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts ACFSX vs RGAHX
ACFSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACFSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACFSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. ACFSX (2B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ACFSX: RGAHX (0.41) vs ACFSX (0.00). ACFSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: ACFSX (20 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). ACFSX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ACFSX (15.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACFSX: RGAHX (250) vs ACFSX (5000000). ACFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.12 vs. RGAHX (1.64). ACFSX return over 5 years is better than : 31.09 vs. RGAHX (13.85).
| ACFSX | RGAHX | ACFSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.617 | 5.692 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 1.64 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.33 | 36.31 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.09 | 13.85 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 367.78 | 99.57 | 369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers