Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGGX vs FGDCX
ACGGX vs FGDCX Comparison
Open Charts ACGGX vs FGDCX
ACGGX vs FGDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGGX vs. FGDCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGGX is a Buy and FGDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. ACGGX (1.69B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than ACGGX: FGDCX (4.68) vs ACGGX (0.64). ACGGX was incepted earlier than FGDCX: ACGGX (28 years) vs FGDCX (19 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than ACGGX (0.91). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. ACGGX (20.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGGX: FGDCX (0) vs ACGGX (2500). ACGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.55 vs. FGDCX (57.95). ACGGX return over 5 years is better than : 137.43 vs. FGDCX (101.94).
| ACGGX | FGDCX | ACGGX / FGDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.794 | 3.687 | 22% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 4.23B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 4.68 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.55 | 57.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 194.19 | 166.43 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.43 | 101.94 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 254.16 | 179.26 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement