Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGGX vs FGDCX
ACGGX vs FGDCX Comparison
Open Charts ACGGX vs FGDCX
ACGGX vs FGDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGGX vs. FGDCX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGGX is a Hold and FGDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. ACGGX (1.77B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than ACGGX: FGDCX (4.21) vs ACGGX (0.52). ACGGX was incepted earlier than FGDCX: ACGGX (28 years) vs FGDCX (20 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than ACGGX (0.91). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. ACGGX (20.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGGX: FGDCX (0) vs ACGGX (2500). FGDCX (39.33) and ACGGX (37.65) have marching annual gain over last year. ACGGX return over 5 years is better than : 219.93 vs. FGDCX (171.27).
| ACGGX | FGDCX | ACGGX / FGDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.785 | 13.768 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 4.44B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 4.21 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.65 | 39.33 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 246.16 | 216.09 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.93 | 171.27 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 269.01 | 189.70 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement