ACGP
Price
$32.15
Change
-$0.82 (-2.49%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
678.16M
BN
Price
$69.58
Change
+$2.53 (+3.77%)
Updated
Sep 11, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.82B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGP vs BN

Header iconACGP vs BN Comparison
Open Charts ACGP vs BNBanner chart's image
Associated Capital Group
Price$32.15
Change-$0.82 (-2.49%)
Volume$1.98K
Capitalization678.16M
Brookfield
Price$69.58
Change+$2.53 (+3.77%)
Volume$600
Capitalization100.82B
ACGP vs BN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGP vs. BN commentary
Sep 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGP is a StrongBuy and BN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGP: $32.15 vs. BN: $67.05)
Brand notoriety: ACGP and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGP: 12% vs. BN: 83%
Market capitalization -- ACGP: $678.16M vs. BN: $100.82B
ACGP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $678.16M. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $100.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than ACGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGP is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

ACGP (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.29% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($101B) has a higher market cap than ACGP($678M). BN has higher P/E ratio than ACGP: BN (152.39) vs ACGP (12.66). BN YTD gains are higher at: 17.104 vs. ACGP (-6.157). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. ACGP (67.5M). BN has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. ACGP (392M). BN has higher revenues than ACGP: BN (76.1B) vs ACGP (11.9M).
ACGPBNACGP / BN
Capitalization678M101B1%
EBITDA67.5M30.3B0%
Gain YTD-6.15717.104-36%
P/E Ratio12.66152.398%
Revenue11.9M76.1B0%
Total Cash392M22.9B2%
Total DebtN/A251B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGP vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
ACGP
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
8391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGP's Valuation (31) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (33). This means that ACGP’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACGP (100). This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

ACGP's SMR Rating (83) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (91). This means that ACGP’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ACGP (64). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACGP (91). This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGPBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMGCX26.17N/A
N/A
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv C
PJVQX24.55N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Value R6
JMCRX22.28N/A
N/A
James Micro Cap
DIFHX12.52N/A
N/A
MFS Diversified Income R6
FMCVX26.33N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val R6

ACGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGP has been loosely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGP jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGP
1D Price
Change %
ACGP100%
-2.49%
SEIC - ACGP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
OWL - ACGP
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.67%
PFG - ACGP
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BN - ACGP
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
TROW - ACGP
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.30%
BAM - BN
83%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
More