Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGR vs IWF
ACGR vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts ACGR vs IWF
ACGR vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGR vs. IWF commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGR is a Buy and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. ACGR (10.8M). ACGR has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: ACGR (7.276) vs IWF (6.354). ACGR was incepted earlier than IWF: ACGR (5 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than ACGR (0.39). ACGR has a higher turnover IWF (16.00) vs IWF (16.00).
| ACGR | IWF | ACGR / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 7.276 | 6.354 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 10.8M | 128B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.18 | 217% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 16.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 0.36 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACGR | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ACGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGR and POOL have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGR and POOL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGR | 100% | N/A | ||
| POOL - ACGR | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| HD - ACGR | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| VRT - ACGR | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| PGR - ACGR | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| NVO - ACGR | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||