It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while UHS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.
ACHC is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ACHC | UHS | ACHC / UHS | |
Capitalization | 7.02B | 12.3B | 57% |
EBITDA | 189M | 1.71B | 11% |
Gain YTD | 10.416 | 2.999 | 347% |
P/E Ratio | 24.81 | 17.13 | 145% |
Revenue | 2.93B | 14.3B | 20% |
Total Cash | 100M | 119M | 84% |
Total Debt | 1.5B | 5.37B | 28% |
ACHC | UHS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (35) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as ACHC (63) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as ACHC (75) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's SMR Rating (53) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as ACHC (70) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as ACHC (62) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
ACHC's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (84) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ACHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
ACHC | UHS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago66% | 11 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago67% | 11 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago75% | 11 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago70% | 11 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago68% | 11 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago68% | 11 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago63% | 20 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago65% | 11 days ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACHC has been loosely correlated with CIVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACHC jumps, then CIVI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACHC | 100% | +4.36% | ||
CIVI - ACHC | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
UHS - ACHC | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
EHC - ACHC | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
SGRY - ACHC | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
CCRN - ACHC | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.