It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACIW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIDCC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACIW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IDCC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACIW (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.41% price change this week, while IDCC (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
ACIW is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
IDCC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ACIW | IDCC | ACIW / IDCC | |
Capitalization | 3.53B | 2.48B | 142% |
EBITDA | 360M | 357M | 101% |
Gain YTD | 77.418 | 70.170 | 110% |
P/E Ratio | 28.92 | 12.78 | 226% |
Revenue | 1.45B | 550M | 264% |
Total Cash | 164M | 1.01B | 16% |
Total Debt | 1.08B | 625M | 172% |
ACIW | IDCC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IDCC's Valuation (46) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (53) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (33) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's SMR Rating (23) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (55) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACIW (38) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACIW (85) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW | IDCC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago67% | 6 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 4 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago51% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIW has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIW jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACIW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACIW | 100% | -1.29% | ||
QTWO - ACIW | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
OLO - ACIW | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
EEFT - ACIW | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
ALRM - ACIW | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
SPSC - ACIW | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCC has been loosely correlated with OLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDCC jumps, then OLO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IDCC | 100% | +0.56% | ||
OLO - IDCC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
ACIW - IDCC | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
QTWO - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
CWAN - IDCC | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
PEGA - IDCC | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More |