Advertisement
IDCC vs PSFE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCC is a Buy and PSFE is a StrongBuy.
IDCC | PSFE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IDCC's Valuation (17) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as PSFE (33) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew similarly to PSFE’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSFE (100) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew significantly faster than PSFE’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's SMR Rating (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSFE (97) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSFE’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSFE (84) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSFE’s over the last 12 months.
IDCC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSFE (58) in the null industry. This means that IDCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSFE’s over the last 12 months.
| IDCC | PSFE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IDCC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while PSFE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IDCC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PSFE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IDCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSFE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IDCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
- PSFE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IDCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while PSFE (@Computer Communications) price change was -14.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
IDCC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PSFE is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.04% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-1.83% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
IDCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCC has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDCC jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDCC | 100% | +4.25% | ||
| ACIW - IDCC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| PSFE - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| ZETA - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| FFIV - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SNPS - IDCC | 37% Loosely correlated | +12.78% | ||
More | ||||
PSFE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSFE has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSFE jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSFE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSFE | 100% | -3.37% | ||
| CLSK - PSFE | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| CLVT - PSFE | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| GLOB - PSFE | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.57% | ||
| ACN - PSFE | 55% Loosely correlated | +15.78% | ||
| CNXC - PSFE | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.26% | ||
More | ||||