ACLS
Price
$134.10
Change
-$7.41 (-5.24%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$166.97
Change
-$4.14 (-2.42%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
175.99B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACLS vs QCOM

ACLS vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) vs. Qualcomm (QCOM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) is a specialized semiconductor equipment manufacturer, while Qualcomm (QCOM) is a diversified semiconductor and wireless technology giant — two fundamentally different plays on the chip industry.
  • ACLS has delivered outsized year-to-date gains (approximately 65–70%) on a powerful recovery from its 2024 trough, while QCOM has posted more moderate single-digit to low-double-digit returns over the same period.
  • Qualcomm generates annual revenue of roughly $44 billion with a market capitalization near $190 billion, dwarfing Axcelis, which posted about $839 million in annual revenue with a market cap around $4 billion.
  • Both companies are navigating a cyclical semiconductor environment, but ACLS faces more acute exposure to capital equipment spending cycles, while QCOM benefits from diversification across handsets, automotive, and the Internet of Things (IoT).
  • Recent quarters show ACLS managing through a revenue contraction while maintaining profitability, while QCOM has sustained double-digit revenue growth, albeit with earnings per share (EPS) impacted by one-time charges.
  • Risk profiles differ sharply: ACLS is a smaller, higher-beta name with volatile swings, while QCOM offers a dividend yield near 2% and broader business stability.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the semiconductor sector face a wide spectrum of opportunities — from niche equipment suppliers to diversified chipmakers powering global connectivity. Comparing ACLS (Axcelis Technologies) and QCOM (Qualcomm) illustrates this range. Axcelis is a focused ion implantation equipment manufacturer serving chip fabrication plants, while Qualcomm is a dominant force in mobile processors, wireless modems, and licensed intellectual property. This comparison is relevant for traders weighing growth-versus-stability trade-offs and for long-term investors assessing exposure to different segments of the semiconductor value chain. Both stocks have charted distinct paths through the current market cycle, making a side-by-side analysis timely and instructive.

ACLS Overview and Recent Performance

ACLS (Axcelis Technologies), headquartered in Beverly, Massachusetts, is a leading producer of ion implantation equipment — a critical step in semiconductor manufacturing where ions are precisely embedded into silicon wafers to modify their electrical properties. The company also supplies dry strip, photostabilization, and rapid thermal processing equipment, alongside a growing aftermarket parts and services business known as Customer Solutions and Innovation (CS&I).

Axcelis has experienced a pronounced cyclical swing over the past several quarters. After a challenging 2024 that saw the stock decline roughly 46%, shares staged a notable recovery through 2025 and into mid-2026, delivering year-to-date gains exceeding 65%. In its most recently reported quarterly results, the company posted revenue of approximately $194.5 million with non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) diluted EPS of $1.13. While these figures represented year-over-year declines — revenue fell from about $256.5 million in the same quarter a year earlier — the results exceeded analyst expectations and demonstrated the company's ability to generate solid profitability amid what management has characterized as a "cyclical digestion period."

The company's CS&I segment has been a bright spot, achieving record performance and providing a recurring revenue stream that partially offsets the lumpy nature of equipment sales. Axcelis maintains a strong balance sheet with over $590 million in cash and marketable securities, giving it ample financial flexibility. Share repurchases have also signaled management's confidence in long-term fundamentals. However, investors should note that the ion implantation market is highly concentrated, and Axcelis's fortunes are closely tied to capital expenditure decisions at major chip manufacturers.

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QCOM (Qualcomm), based in San Diego, California, is one of the world's largest fabless semiconductor companies. It designs and markets processors (notably its Snapdragon platform), wireless modems, and radio-frequency components, while also generating substantial revenue from licensing its extensive patent portfolio. Qualcomm's technology powers a vast range of smartphones, automotive systems, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices.

Qualcomm's financial scale dwarfs that of Axcelis, with fiscal-year 2025 revenue reaching approximately $44.3 billion — a 13.7% increase from the prior year. The company has maintained strong operating cash flow, generating over $14 billion in fiscal 2025, and continues to return capital to shareholders through dividends (yielding roughly 1.8–2.0%) and share repurchases. In recent market activity, QCOM shares have shown resilience, posting a roughly 14% gain in 2025 and trading with a price-to-earnings ratio in the mid-to-high teens — a relatively modest valuation for a technology leader of its caliber.

Earnings have been somewhat volatile on a GAAP basis. A significant non-cash charge in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2025 related to a tax matter pushed GAAP EPS lower, obscuring what was otherwise solid operational performance. Non-GAAP EPS, which excludes such items, has more consistently reflected Qualcomm's underlying earnings power. The company's diversification beyond handsets into automotive and IoT continues to be a long-term growth narrative, with automotive revenue showing particular momentum as vehicles become increasingly connected and autonomous. Qualcomm ended its most recent fiscal year with over $50 billion in total assets and a strong equity base.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like ACLS and QCOM, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. These bots employ a wide variety of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and each comes with its own performance track record, statistical profile, and ticker coverage. Some bots specialize exclusively in semiconductor stocks, making them potentially relevant for those monitoring ACLS and QCOM. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help traders identify automated strategies that match their risk tolerance and market outlook.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Placing these two companies side by side reveals stark contrasts across nearly every meaningful dimension:

Business Model: ACLS is a capital equipment supplier — its revenue depends on semiconductor manufacturers building or upgrading fabrication facilities. QCOM, by contrast, is a product and licensing company — it sells chips and collects royalties on a per-device basis. This makes ACLS more leveraged to cyclical capital expenditure (capex) cycles, while QCOM benefits from recurring unit-driven demand.

Growth Drivers: Axcelis is riding demand for advanced ion implantation in leading-edge logic chips and the emerging silicon carbide power semiconductor market. Qualcomm is driven by 5G smartphone penetration, automotive digitization, and edge-AI computing. QCOM's revenue base is broader and less dependent on any single end-market trend.

Recent Momentum: ACLS has produced a powerful recovery rally from deeply oversold levels, making it one of the stronger semiconductor equipment rebounds in recent months. QCOM has delivered steadier but less spectacular returns, reflecting its maturity and size.

Risk Factors: ACLS carries higher concentration risk — a handful of large customers can significantly impact quarterly results, and the equipment cycle can turn quickly. QCOM faces geopolitical risk related to US–China trade dynamics and ongoing legal and regulatory scrutiny of its licensing model, but its diversification provides ballast.

Market Sentiment: ACLS attracts momentum-oriented and value-recovery investors betting on a cyclical upturn. QCOM draws dividend-seeking and value-conscious investors who prize its cash generation and intellectual property moat. Valuation metrics reflect this divide: ACLS trades at a modest multiple of depressed earnings, while QCOM trades at a discount to its historical valuation ranges on a non-GAAP basis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market patterns and the factors analyzed above, Tickeron's AI methodology would likely express a nuanced preference between these two names depending on the specific strategy employed. For trend-following bots focused on momentum and relative strength, ACLS would likely garner attention due to its powerful recovery trajectory and the potential for continued upside if the semiconductor equipment cycle strengthens further. For stability-oriented or dividend-focused AI strategies, QCOM would probably register as the more consistent candidate, given its broader revenue base, strong free cash flow, and shareholder returns. The AI's probabilistic assessment would likely favor QCOM for risk-adjusted positioning over a full market cycle, while acknowledging that ACLS may offer higher potential upside — accompanied by greater volatility — for traders with a higher risk tolerance and a constructive view on semiconductor capital spending.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ACLS vs. QCOM commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACLS is a StrongBuy and QCOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (ACLS: $134.10 vs. QCOM: $166.97)
Brand notoriety: ACLS: Not notable vs. QCOM: Notable
ACLS represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while QCOM is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACLS: 35% vs. QCOM: 35%
Market capitalization -- ACLS: $4.12B vs. QCOM: $175.99B
ACLS [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $4.12B. QCOM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $175.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $690.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.01T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $67.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $184.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACLS and QCOM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than ACLS.

Price Growth

ACLS (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.34% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-1.99% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($176B) has a higher market cap than ACLS($4.12B). ACLS has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: ACLS (41.65) vs QCOM (17.95). ACLS YTD gains are higher at: 66.916 vs. QCOM (-1.396). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. ACLS (139M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. ACLS (367M). ACLS has less debt than QCOM: ACLS (42M) vs QCOM (15.3B). QCOM has higher revenues than ACLS: QCOM (44.5B) vs ACLS (845M).
ACLSQCOMACLS / QCOM
Capitalization4.12B176B2%
EBITDA139M14B1%
Gain YTD66.916-1.396-4,794%
P/E Ratio41.6517.95232%
Revenue845M44.5B2%
Total Cash367M9.8B4%
Total Debt42M15.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACLS vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
ACLS
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5653
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6673
SMR RATING
1..100
7327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (40) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACLS (47) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to ACLS’s over the last 12 months.

ACLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (73) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ACLS’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACLS (73) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACLS’s over the last 12 months.

ACLS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (54) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ACLS’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

ACLS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ACLS’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACLSQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJJ148.201.45
+0.99%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
PBJ47.930.22
+0.46%
Invesco Food & Beverage ETF
TDAQ26.02-0.31
-1.18%
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Gr & Dl Inc ETF
ONDU4.52-0.12
-2.59%
Tradr 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF
LABU245.60-8.17
-3.22%
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF

ACLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACLS has been closely correlated with VECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACLS jumps, then VECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACLS
1D Price
Change %
ACLS100%
-5.24%
VECO - ACLS
90%
Closely correlated
-5.35%
NXPI - ACLS
71%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
ADI - ACLS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
QCOM - ACLS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
POWI - ACLS
70%
Closely correlated
-10.46%
More