Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACMAX vs CRAZX
ACMAX vs CRAZX Comparison
Open Charts ACMAX vs CRAZX
ACMAX vs CRAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMAX vs. CRAZX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMAX is a Hold and CRAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.62B vs. ACMAX (36.6M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than ACMAX: CRAZX (2.62) vs ACMAX (0.00). ACMAX was incepted earlier than CRAZX: ACMAX (11 years) vs CRAZX (14 years). ACMAX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). CRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. ACMAX (78.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs ACMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.03 vs. ACMAX (8.08). ACMAX (9.32) and CRAZX (9.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ACMAX | CRAZX | ACMAX / CRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.81 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.81 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.277 | 10.293 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.6M | 2.62B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.08 | 14.03 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.12 | 44.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.32 | 9.27 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.83 | 44.28 | 76% |