Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. FLMFX (885M). FLMFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMFX (1.06) vs ACRIX (0.55). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.25) and ACRIX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.82 vs. FLMFX (-11.12). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.32 vs. ACRIX (27.41).
| ACRIX | FLMFX | ACRIX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.25 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.25 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.432 | -6.998 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 885M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.06 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.82 | -11.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.03 | 0.65 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.41 | 33.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers