Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a StrongBuy and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. FLMFX (964M). FLMFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMFX (1.36) vs ACRIX (0.86). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: ACRIX (8 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. ACRIX (176.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. FLMFX (4.38). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. ACRIX (19.39).
| ACRIX | FLMFX | ACRIX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.822 | 3.712 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 964M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 4.38 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.02 | 7.45 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.39 | 27.87 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers