Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. FLMFX (968M). FLMFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMFX (1.03) vs ACRIX (0.54). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.20) and ACRIX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.97 vs. FLMFX (-8.78). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.46 vs. ACRIX (31.82).
| ACRIX | FLMFX | ACRIX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.618 | 0.880 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 968M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.03 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.97 | -8.78 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.20 | 11.08 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.82 | 36.46 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement