Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison
Open Charts ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. FLMFX (1.27B). ACRIX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: ACRIX (0.67) vs FLMFX (0.61). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: ACRIX (10 years) vs FLMFX (38 years). FLMFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.15). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 307.00 vs. ACRIX (172.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.17 vs. ACRIX (16.06). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.21 vs. ACRIX (14.72).
| ACRIX | FLMFX | ACRIX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.21 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.21 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.235 | 10.915 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 1.27B | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.61 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | 21.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.80 | 31.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.72 | 26.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers