Ad is loading...
ACSAF
Price
$45.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
ROAD
Price
$88.52
Change
-$0.72 (-0.81%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACSAF vs ROAD

Header iconACSAF vs ROAD Comparison
Open Charts ACSAF vs ROADBanner chart's image
ACS Actividades De Construccion Y Servicios SA
Price$45.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Construction Partners
Price$88.52
Change-$0.72 (-0.81%)
Volume$317.86K
CapitalizationN/A
ACSAF vs ROAD Comparison Chart
Loading...
ROAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACSAF vs. ROAD commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSAF is a Buy and ROAD is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ACSAF: $45.33 vs. ROAD: $88.52)
Brand notoriety: ACSAF and ROAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACSAF: 705% vs. ROAD: 83%
Market capitalization -- ACSAF: $10.81B vs. ROAD: $4.94B
ACSAF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $10.81B. ROAD’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $4.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACSAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileROAD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACSAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ROAD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ROAD is a better buy in the long-term than ACSAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ROAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ROAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ACSAF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while ROAD (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -6.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

ROAD is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.30% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACSAF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than ROAD($4.94B). ROAD has higher P/E ratio than ACSAF: ROAD (66.06) vs ACSAF (11.19). ROAD YTD gains are higher at: 103.401 vs. ACSAF (4.604). ACSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.34B vs. ROAD (199M). ACSAF has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. ROAD (56.3M). ROAD has less debt than ACSAF: ROAD (512M) vs ACSAF (12.5B). ACSAF has higher revenues than ROAD: ACSAF (37.5B) vs ROAD (1.76B).
ACSAFROADACSAF / ROAD
Capitalization10.8B4.94B219%
EBITDA2.34B199M1,176%
Gain YTD4.604103.4014%
P/E Ratio11.1966.0617%
Revenue37.5B1.76B2,129%
Total Cash11B56.3M19,538%
Total Debt12.5B512M2,441%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACSAF vs ROAD: Fundamental Ratings
ACSAF
ROAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
776
SMR RATING
1..100
9659
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8672
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACSAF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROAD (93) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACSAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROAD’s over the last 12 months.

ROAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACSAF (77) in the null industry. This means that ROAD’s stock grew significantly faster than ACSAF’s over the last 12 months.

ROAD's SMR Rating (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACSAF (96) in the null industry. This means that ROAD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACSAF’s over the last 12 months.

ROAD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACSAF (47) in the null industry. This means that ROAD’s stock grew similarly to ACSAF’s over the last 12 months.

ROAD's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACSAF (86) in the null industry. This means that ROAD’s stock grew similarly to ACSAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ROAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGSCX33.670.08
+0.24%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs C
IVOAX20.50-0.14
-0.68%
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Income Opps A
CWGIX67.23-0.72
-1.06%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc A
TSRPX20.79-0.33
-1.56%
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity Premier
AGIFX18.68-0.40
-2.10%
Alger Responsible Investing I

ACSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACSAF and WLGS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACSAF and WLGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACSAF
1D Price
Change %
ACSAF100%
N/A
WLGS - ACSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.13%
J - ACSAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
APG - ACSAF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
ACXIF - ACSAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROAD - ACSAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More