ADSK
Price
$209.75
Change
+$4.49 (+2.19%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
44.29B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSFT
Price
$381.70
Change
+$0.12 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.84T
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADSK vs MSFT

ADSK vs MSFT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autodesk (ADSK) vs. Microsoft (MSFT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Autodesk (ADSK) has demonstrated resilient revenue growth of approximately 18% year-over-year and maintains a 97% recurring revenue base, though its stock has declined roughly 30% year-to-date alongside the broader software selloff.
  • Microsoft (MSFT) remains the worst-performing Magnificent Seven stock in 2026, down approximately 20%, weighed by concerns over massive AI-related capital expenditure (capex) and questions about return on its $190 billion spending plan.
  • Both companies face the same macro headwind: investor anxiety that AI (artificial intelligence) could disrupt traditional software subscription models, compressing valuations across the enterprise software sector.
  • Autodesk is actively expanding into operations and asset management through its $3.6 billion acquisition of MaintainX, while Microsoft is restructuring its Xbox gaming division and sharpening its AI monetization strategy ahead of its July 29 earnings report.
  • Wall Street consensus rates both stocks favorably, but Microsoft trades at a significantly lower P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of roughly 23x versus Autodesk's approximately 31x, reflecting divergent market narratives around maturity, scale, and growth expectations.
  • Institutional ownership is high for both — approximately 90% for Autodesk and 71% for Microsoft — signaling durable institutional confidence despite recent price weakness.

Introduction

Comparing ADSK and MSFT may seem asymmetrical at first glance — a $46-billion design-software specialist versus a $2.9-trillion technology conglomerate. Yet both are deeply embedded in the enterprise software ecosystem that has come under intense investor scrutiny in 2026. The market's recalibration of software valuations, driven by fears that AI will cannibalize legacy subscription revenue, has affected both stocks in measurable ways. For traders evaluating relative strength, growth trajectories, and risk exposures within the software sector, a side-by-side comparison of Autodesk and Microsoft offers a useful lens through which to understand the forces reshaping technology investing. Whether you are a growth-oriented investor seeking exposure to AI-driven design tools or a value-conscious buyer evaluating a mega-cap at compressed multiples, the contrasts between these two names are worth examining closely.

ADSK Overview and Recent Performance

Autodesk, headquartered in San Rafael, California, is a global leader in design and creation software, serving the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC), manufacturing, and media and entertainment industries. Its flagship products — including AutoCAD, Revit, Inventor, Fusion 360, and Maya — form the backbone of digital design workflows across industries that shape the built world. The company also operates cloud-based collaboration platforms such as BIM 360 and Autodesk Construction Cloud.

In recent months, Autodesk has delivered consistently strong operational results. Its most recent quarterly report showed revenue of $1.93 billion, up 18.4% year-over-year, with non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings per share of $2.99, beating consensus estimates. Recurring revenue now accounts for 97% of total net revenue, and the company's net revenue retention rate remains above 110% in constant currency, indicating healthy expansion within its existing customer base. Free cash flow generation has also accelerated sharply. The company raised its full-year FY2027 guidance across revenue, billings, EPS, and operating margin.

Despite this fundamental strength, Autodesk shares have been caught in the broader software-sector downdraft. The stock is down approximately 30% since the beginning of 2026 and trades roughly 38% below its 52-week high. Investor concerns center on whether AI-native design tools could erode Autodesk's subscription-based moat over time. However, the company has responded proactively — announcing a $3.6 billion all-cash acquisition of MaintainX to expand into the operations and asset management market, and forming a strategic collaboration with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to broaden cloud distribution and AI-integrated workflows. Insider buying by directors in recent weeks has also signaled internal confidence.

MSFT Overview and Recent Performance

Microsoft, headquartered in Redmond, Washington, needs little introduction. With a market capitalization approaching $2.93 trillion, it operates across cloud computing (Azure), productivity software (Microsoft 365), enterprise solutions, gaming (Xbox), and a rapidly growing AI portfolio anchored by Copilot integrations and its expanded partnership model with multiple AI model providers. The company's diversification across enterprise, consumer, and infrastructure markets is unmatched in scale.

Operationally, Microsoft has continued to post impressive headline numbers. In its most recent fiscal quarter, the company reported revenue of $82.89 billion (up 18.3% year-over-year) and EPS of $4.27, both exceeding analyst expectations. Azure revenue growth accelerated to approximately 40%, and the company disclosed an AI-related annual revenue run rate of $37 billion — up 123% year-over-year. Yet the stock has been the worst performer among the so-called Magnificent Seven in 2026, declining roughly 20% year-to-date and trading well below its 52-week high of $555.45.

The market's primary concern is Microsoft's unprecedented capital spending commitment: a projected $190 billion in fiscal 2026 capex, largely directed toward AI data center infrastructure. Investors are questioning when — and whether — these outlays will generate adequate returns. Additional headwinds include a restructuring of the Xbox gaming division, which has underperformed internal targets and prompted approximately 3,200 layoffs, as well as broader anxiety about AI-native competitors potentially eroding the traditional SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) pricing model that Microsoft helped pioneer. On the positive side, recent CIO (Chief Information Officer) surveys point to strong enterprise demand for Azure and Copilot, and Microsoft has launched a $2.5 billion initiative — the Microsoft Frontier Co. — to embed AI engineers directly with enterprise clients. The company's upcoming fiscal Q4 earnings report on July 29 is widely viewed as a potential catalyst.

Trending AI Robots

For traders looking to navigate stock comparisons like this one with data-driven precision, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway to algorithmic trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds), and forex markets. These bots employ diverse trading styles — ranging from short-term swing trading and momentum-based approaches to longer-duration trend-following and mean-reversion strategies — each with distinct performance metrics, risk parameters, and ticker universes. Only the bots best suited to prevailing market conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section, making it a dynamic showcase of what is working right now. Whether a trader is interested in a bot that specializes in software-sector names like ADSK or MSFT, or one that scans across multiple sectors, this curated list provides a transparent starting point. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which automated strategies are currently capturing market opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model and Revenue Composition. Autodesk is a focused, vertical software company with 97% recurring revenue derived primarily from design and engineering professionals in AEC and manufacturing. Microsoft is a horizontal technology platform spanning cloud infrastructure, productivity, enterprise software, gaming, and AI services. Autodesk's narrower focus means its fortunes are closely tied to construction cycles and manufacturing investment trends; Microsoft's breadth provides diversification but also exposes it to more variables — from cloud competition to consumer gaming cycles.

Growth Drivers. Autodesk's growth is anchored in cloud migration, the MaintainX acquisition (targeting a $40 billion operations and asset management market), and AI-powered design automation. Microsoft's growth narrative centers on Azure infrastructure scaling, Copilot monetization across its Office and enterprise suites, and AI platform revenue. Microsoft's AI revenue run rate of $37 billion already dwarfs Autodesk's entire annual revenue base of roughly $7.2 billion, but Autodesk's AI integration into industry-specific design workflows could prove highly defensible.

Recent Momentum and Sentiment. Both stocks have been materially affected by the same macro theme: the software sector's repricing amid AI-disruption fears. Autodesk has fallen further from its highs (down ~38%) than Microsoft (down ~29% from its 52-week peak), but Autodesk's fundamentals — accelerating free cash flow, strong retention rates, and insider buying — suggest operational resilience. Microsoft faces more complex sentiment headwinds: capex anxiety, Xbox restructuring, and questions about whether its AI investments can generate proportionate returns.

Risk Factors. Autodesk's key risks include integration challenges with MaintainX, concentration in cyclical end markets (construction, manufacturing), and the risk that AI-native competitors unbundle its product suite. Microsoft's risks include the possibility that its $190 billion capex cycle underperforms relative to expectations, competitive pressure from AI-native startups and other hyperscale cloud providers, and execution risk in its gaming division restructuring.

Valuation. Microsoft trades at approximately 23x trailing earnings — near the lower end of its historical range and below the broader S&P 500 average. Autodesk trades at roughly 31x trailing earnings, a premium that reflects its higher growth rate and the perceived durability of its niche. For value-oriented investors, Microsoft's compressed multiple may appear attractive; for growth-focused investors, Autodesk's higher multiple may be justified by its faster organic revenue expansion and expanding addressable market.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, fundamental momentum, and relative positioning within the current market regime, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a measured preference for ADSK over MSFT in the near-to-intermediate term. This assessment is not rooted in a claim that Autodesk is the superior business — Microsoft's scale, diversification, and $37 billion AI revenue run rate are formidable — but rather reflects a probabilistic reading of trend signals. Autodesk has demonstrated consistent earnings beats, rising guidance, strong free cash flow conversion, and insider buying at depressed levels, suggesting that operational momentum may be diverging favorably from price action. Microsoft, while fundamentally robust, is contending with multiple overhangs — capex scrutiny, gaming headwinds, and a critical earnings report on the horizon — that introduce near-term uncertainty. In a market environment where software stocks are broadly out of favor, the AI's bias tilts toward the name with cleaner execution momentum and fewer unresolved narrative tensions. As always, this is a probabilistic assessment based on currently observable data, not a prediction of future outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ADSK vs. MSFT commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADSK is a Buy and MSFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (ADSK: $209.75 vs. MSFT: $381.70)
Brand notoriety: ADSK and MSFT are both notable
ADSK represents the Packaged Software, while MSFT is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADSK: 56% vs. MSFT: 43%
Market capitalization -- ADSK: $44.29B vs. MSFT: $2.84T
ADSK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $44.29B. MSFT’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.84T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $473.93B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.84T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ADSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSFT is a better buy in the long-term than ADSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MSFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ADSK is a better buy in the short-term than MSFT.

Price Growth

ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.94% price change this week, while MSFT (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -5.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

MSFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-5.08% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSFT($2.84T) has a higher market cap than ADSK($44.3B). ADSK has higher P/E ratio than MSFT: ADSK (30.62) vs MSFT (22.73). MSFT YTD gains are higher at: -20.723 vs. ADSK (-29.141). MSFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199B vs. ADSK (2.33B). MSFT has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. ADSK (2.92B). ADSK has less debt than MSFT: ADSK (2.72B) vs MSFT (57B). MSFT has higher revenues than ADSK: MSFT (318B) vs ADSK (7.51B).
ADSKMSFTADSK / MSFT
Capitalization44.3B2.84T2%
EBITDA2.33B199B1%
Gain YTD-29.141-20.723141%
P/E Ratio30.6222.73135%
Revenue7.51B318B2%
Total Cash2.92B78.2B4%
Total Debt2.72B57B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADSK vs MSFT: Fundamental Ratings
ADSK
MSFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3728
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
2029
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9489
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSFT's Valuation (52) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (73). This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (100). This means that MSFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MSFT (29). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MSFT (61). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (94). This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADSKMSFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPR63.531.55
+2.50%
EPR Properties
OCSL11.680.06
+0.52%
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp
ARGX918.22-6.38
-0.69%
argenx SE
SLNH1.26-0.06
-4.55%
Soluna Holdings
LHAI0.90-0.05
-5.04%
Linkhome Holdings Inc

MSFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSFT has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSFT jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSFT
1D Price
Change %
MSFT100%
+0.03%
NOW - MSFT
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.44%
CDNS - MSFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
COIN - MSFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
CLSK - MSFT
54%
Loosely correlated
-6.98%
ADSK - MSFT
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
More