Advertisement
AEBZY vs BUDFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEBZY is a Hold and BUDFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEBZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBUDFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AEBZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BUDFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEBZY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BUDFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEBZY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- BUDFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AEBZY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while BUDFF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +4.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.42%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEBZY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.10% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+2.06% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| AEBZY | BUDFF | AEBZY / BUDFF | |
| Capitalization | 1.97B | 118B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 48.3B | 21.1B | 229% |
| Gain YTD | -41.781 | 23.684 | -176% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.60 | 17.65 | 49% |
| Revenue | 197B | 58.5B | 337% |
| Total Cash | 37.8B | 7.27B | 520% |
| Total Debt | 101B | 75.6B | 134% |
AEBZY | BUDFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 11 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BUDFF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AEBZY (52). This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to AEBZY’s over the last 12 months.
BUDFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as AEBZY (85). This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to AEBZY’s over the last 12 months.
BUDFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AEBZY (100). This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to AEBZY’s over the last 12 months.
BUDFF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as AEBZY (65). This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to AEBZY’s over the last 12 months.
AEBZY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUDFF (53). This means that AEBZY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
| AEBZY | BUDFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 50% |
Advertisement
AEBZY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEBZY and ASBRF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEBZY and ASBRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEBZY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEBZY | 100% | +3.28% | ||
| ASBRF - AEBZY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRBMF - AEBZY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ADWPF - AEBZY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNDL - AEBZY | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.03% | ||
| BUDFF - AEBZY | -1% Poorly correlated | +3.16% | ||
More | ||||
BUDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUDFF has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUDFF jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUDFF | 100% | +3.16% | ||
| BUD - BUDFF | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| PRNDY - BUDFF | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.36% | ||
| ABEV - BUDFF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
| DEO - BUDFF | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
| CABJF - BUDFF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||