Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs FKIDX
AEGFX vs FKIDX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs FKIDX
AEGFX vs FKIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. FKIDX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and FKIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FKIDX (5.17B). AEGFX pays higher dividends than FKIDX: AEGFX (2.55) vs FKIDX (1.70). AEGFX was incepted earlier than FKIDX: AEGFX (25 years) vs FKIDX (9 years). AEGFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FKIDX (0.60). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FKIDX (45.00). FKIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEGFX: FKIDX (0) vs AEGFX (250). FKIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.03 vs. AEGFX (7.34). FKIDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. AEGFX (-2.79).
| AEGFX | FKIDX | AEGFX / FKIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.60 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.60 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.347 | 16.422 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 5.17B | 2,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 1.70 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 23.03 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.68 | 65.72 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.79 | 44.32 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement