Advertisement
AEHR vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEHR is a Hold and QCOM is a StrongBuy.
AEHR | QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (46) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as AEHR (69) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to AEHR’s over the last 12 months.
AEHR's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (70) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AEHR’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's SMR Rating (31) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHR (92) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHR’s over the last 12 months.
AEHR's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (44) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AEHR’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHR (66) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHR’s over the last 12 months.
| AEHR | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 21 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEHR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while QCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AEHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEHR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEHR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AEHR (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -21.05% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was -5.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -11.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -9.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEHR is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-11.06% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-9.78% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NIOG | 5.97 | 0.56 | +10.36% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) | |||
| RSDE | 23.80 | 0.20 | +0.85% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December (RSDE) | |||
| FLKR | 58.36 | 0.37 | +0.64% |
| Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) | |||
| IDYN | 29.95 | 0.13 | +0.45% |
| iShares International Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (IDYN) | |||
| JUCY | 21.76 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY) | |||
AEHR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEHR has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEHR jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEHR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEHR | 100% | -2.95% | ||
| ONTO - AEHR | 69% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| TER - AEHR | 68% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| NVMI - AEHR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| LRCX - AEHR | 67% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| CAMT - AEHR | 66% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||